« | Home | »

Among the Touts

Tags: | |

The only football ticket I’ve ever bought from a tout was for the FA Cup semi-final between Manchester City and United at Wembley last year. It cost me more than a third of my monthly rent. After the tout had satisfied himself that I wasn’t a cop he told me that the ticket was ‘one and a half’ and that I could collect it from his pal. ‘My mate’s in the bookies, ’cause it’s bent round here with the Old Bill.’ In the bookmakers there were horses on the telly, beer in the air, and football on everyone’s lips. A thin man with an unlit cigarette in his mouth gave me a ticket in a Club Wembley branded envelope, and I handed over £150.

Buying multiple gig tickets on several credit cards and selling them for a profit is not only legal but smiled on: the Conservative MP Sajid Javid called such touts ‘entrepreneurs’. But touting football tickets is a criminal offence, punishable with a fine up to £5000 and a ban from all matches for up to ten years. Similar laws are in place for the Olympics, with a maximum fine of £20,000. The Met have been stepping up their arrests of football touts since the beginning of last year, on the reasonable assumption that they are likely to be involved in selling Olympic tickets too. ‘What we have uncovered shows that organised crime networks of the highest level which are known to us are involved in ticketing offences,’ according to the head of Operation Podium.

Many touts wouldn’t see it that way. One, whom I’ve seen at Queens Park Rangers, Arsenal and the Brixton Academy, says that touting is ‘just a fact of life’ but touts are ‘treated like rapists’. ‘They should be going after drug dealers,’ another tout told me outside QPR. ‘We’re just selling tickets to people who want to buy them.’ Though drug dealers could say much the same thing. And fans, like addicts, can be charged well over the odds – even more so, because supply is extremely limited.

With long-term, committed fan bases, Premier League football clubs have been able to sell season tickets and membership schemes, and several use loyalty points to prioritise sales to the most loyal fans. Such closed systems have high barriers to entry and are hard for touts to infiltrate (though one, Anthony O’Mahony, was found in February to have multiple membership cards for two London clubs). The Olympic organisers had no equivalent way to identify ‘genuine fans’ from touts, though there might be fewer tickets on the black market if the ballot that allocated them had been run better.

One thing you can say for the Olympic touts is that they make the corporate sponsors look almost reasonable. One touting website, with a sales line in Manchester but probably based overseas, was offering two closing ceremony tickets for £5939, online credit card transaction only. At that price, you’d be better off with an official package from Thomas Cook: two tickets, plus a night at the Ramada Hyde Park, for £3598.

Comments on “Among the Touts”

  1. jrsd says:

    The only ticket(s) I’ve bought from a tout was for the Proms, a few years ago. In fact, unless things have changed lately, I can recommend it as a way of getting in if the queue for the arena/gallery looks too long. I paid face value for the ticket, which suggests that Proms tickets can be a glut on the market even when a concert is said to be sold out

    • Harry Stopes says:

      I wouldn’t know if that’s usually the case for the Proms or not, but you’re right that touts misjudge the market sometimes and are left selling off their stock cheaply. I once got to see Idlewild at University of London Union for a tenner, which was less than the cover price.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement