« | Home | »

Blowing in the Wind

Tags: |

Legionnaire’s disease got its name in a blaze of publicity when attendees at the 1976 Philadelphia State Convention of the American Legion were struck down with severe pneumonia. They had stayed at the Bellevue-Stratford Hotel from 21 to 24 June: 182 fell ill and 29 died; 39 passers-by were also affected, five fatally. Funerals and marching legionnaires made good television. The story was top of the news for five nights. But the cause was a mystery until a cold review of samples from victims was conducted six months later. It turned out to be a bacterium. This was unexpected. The pathology didn’t fit a bacterial cause, and it was widely believed that bacteria did not spread on the wind.

The first recorded Scottish outbreak was in 1973, with 89 cases and three deaths. The sufferers were mostly from Glasgow. They had been on a package holiday to Benidorm. The lead Scottish investigator ruled out all known causes and was decorated by the Franco government for exonerating Spain. A look-back using tests developed after the discovery of Legionella revealed the actual cause. In 2012 hotels in Benidorm are still infecting tourists with Legionella.

The first case in the current Edinburgh outbreak came to light on Monday 28 May. By Sunday 3 June there were eight cases. Foreign travel was soon ruled out as a common factor. Cooling towers became prime suspects. They are often the source in community outbreaks: the organism grows well in the slime that builds up if maintenance is poor, and they pump out aerosols that travel on the wind. The location of victims pointed to Gorgie, Dalry and Saughton, areas to the south-west of the city centre. The 16 cooling towers there were blasted with chlorine-based biocide.

Because the incubation period can be up to two weeks, a continued rise in the number of cases was predicted. On Tuesday 5 June there were 32, on Wednesday 40, on Thursday 61, on Friday 74 and on Saturday 80. The death of Robert Air was reported on Wednesday; he had been working on a building site in Gorgie.
 
Identifying which cooling tower caused the outbreak will not be easy. The numerical modelling of atmospheric dispersion is well developed. But the mathematics is complex and uncertain. Do you use Lagrangian, Gaussian or Eulerian models? Predicting air flow over the sea is much easier than in towns: stand close to a tall building on a windy day and you’ll feel why. An air flow fit would be helped a lot by finding Legionella bacteria in a tower with the same molecular fingerprint as bacteria from cases. They are being looked for.

The Scottish health minister, Nicola Sturgeon, has dominated media coverage of the outbreak. She has also made use of SGoRR, the Scottish Government Resilience Room, based on COBR, the Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms in Downing Street. It is very hard to justify the involvement of SGoRR. The incident team dealing with the outbreak appears to be doing an effective job. It should be left to get on with it.

Cooling tower problems have been identified in two businesses in Wheatfield Road. It runs into the Gorgie Road, where Robert Air had been working. One is the North British Distillery. The other is Macfarlan Smith, a pharmaceutical company which produces alkaloid opiates and its own speciality, Bitrex, the bitterest substance known. It is put into many things including alcohols, pesticides, shampoos, moth balls, toilet cleaners, disinfectants and air fresheners to make them unpalatable. No smoking guns yet, just improvement notices to both firms from the Health and Safety Executive. But it would be embarrassing if a business engaged in making a component of disinfectants turned out to have endangered the public because it had failed to use them.

Comments on “Blowing in the Wind”

  1. spout says:

    “The Scottish health minister, Nicola Sturgeon, has dominated media coverage of the outbreak. She has also made use of SGoRR, the Scottish Government Resilience Room, based on COBR, the Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms in Downing Street. It is very hard to justify the involvement of SGoRR. The incident team dealing with the outbreak appears to be doing an effective job. It should be left to get on with it.”

    This paragraph is wholly unnecessary and surprising.

    It is in stark contrast to the many commentators and journalists in the Scottish media who have expressed the opinion that there was not more panic/public concern due to a deft and informative handling of the information/narrative by Ms Sturgeon and the SgoRR team.

    What would Prof. Pennington suggest in their place?

    Instead of our elected officials handling this serious outbreak…..perhaps we should have relied on relevant academics with a penchant for media attention, addressing the Scottish public through soft/deferential interviews at regular intervals?

  2. spout says:

    I was initially confused by the paragraph that I highlighted in the above post until I spotted this…

    ‘Professor Hugh’ (as he has allowed himself to be termed) has recorded a short film for the No Campaign in Scotland, which involves scaremongering relating to scientific funding levels in an independent Scotland and firmly puts himself in the No camp.

    It would be appreciated if the LRB editorial team could ‘keep an eye’ on contributors including thinly-veiled political criticism in pieces or make sure that there is a semblance of balance by also commissioning articles from those with a contrasting view.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • pgillott on Wishful Thinking about Climate Change: Phrases like “monumental triumph” and (particularly) “renaissance for humankind” are overdoing it, but to suggest that there is no chance of ...
    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement