« | Home | »

Blockupy Frankfurt

Tags: | |

Though there have been few large demonstrations in Germany against the austerity measures introduced by the European Union, it was inevitable that Frankfurt, the home of the European Central Bank, would become a target. Blockupy Frankfurt called for a series of protests and actions ‘against the austerity dictatorship’ from 16 to 19 May, culminating on Saturday in a march to the ECB. I spoke to Thomas Seibert, a philosopher and member of Blockupy Frankfurt, at the Subversive Forum in Zagreb. ‘We wanted to say there is a choice,’ he said. ‘We don’t have to stick to the German government. We wanted to say, in the Occupy sense, we are the 99 per cent.’
The authorities in Frankfurt responded by banning the march, and told the small Occupy camp around the ECB, who have been there for several months, that they had to leave. The Committee for Basic Rights and Democracy have also had their protest banned. The Frankfurt police contacted 480 people who had been kettled during a protest on 31 March to inform them that they were not allowed to enter downtown Frankfurt on Saturday. ‘You have become noticed,’ Seibert says they were told, ‘and the right to demonstrate is not for people who get noticed.’
Blockupy successfully challenged the outright ban on Saturday’s march. However, the ruling by Frankfurt’s Administrative Court contained a number of restrictions. The civic authorities demanded the names of people who would agree to be responsible for the conduct and safety of others, and the route of the march was both shortened and moved away from the area around the ECB. There are already reports of a heavy police presence, and many Metro and tram stations are closed, as are schools, universities, banks and all the offices of the city administration.
‘The city authorities and the police are helping us very much,’ Seibert says. ‘Now the Greens and the Social Democrats have to decide. If they had said you can do that, only the radical Left would come.’
As for what will happen on Saturday, it seems certain that the protestors will challenge the restrictions. Blockupy Frankfurt is part of the tradition of the Interventionist Left, which Seibert characterises as ‘finding a middle way between just peaceful marching on the streets, and then having a rally with people talking, on the one hand, and on the other this tradition by the autonomous left, small black groups attacking very hard.’ The aim is to break through police corridors and prevent kettling and other containment strategies. Seibert used the analogy of two fists heading towards one another, one representing the police, the other the protestors. ‘We call it the finger,’ he said, and explained how protestors will divide at the moment of apparent confrontation. ‘Two of the fingers will be broken by the police, but three of the fingers will come through.’

Comments on “Blockupy Frankfurt”

  1. Geoff Roberts says:

    See you there, then?

  2. Simon Wood says:

    Interestingly, so to speak, the portrait of “On War” Clausewitz, the philosopher of the battlefield, on wikipedia shows him apparently holding up two fingers. Have a look. He knew his stuff.

  3. Geoff Roberts says:

    Just got back. A lovely day for a demo, over 20,000 says the Frankfurter Allgemeine and they wouldn’t lie to us, would they? Very colourful, hundreds of different groups with a wide range of placards and banners. It was nice to see so many young people, just behind me were the Interventionist Left, with a huge banner and lots of cheeky slogans – they looked like a school class on an outing and their chants had a jolly, optimistic sound. They tried to provoke the police from time to time with chants of ‘you blockaded yourselves!’ Their own tribute to the sterling work done to keep the demonstrators out of the banking quarter yesterday. Biggest demo since the days of the Startbahn West twenty years ago and I hope to see them back on the lawn in front of the ECB on Monday. The ECB is building a huge two-tower block down by the river. I noticed yesterday that the site is heavily protected by barbed wire and a fence three metres high – just in case anybody thought of giving it a try. The FAZ photos feature our boys in black very prominently – the police of course, not the fearsome ‘black block’ that the politicians have been getting hot flushes about. At a rough estimate I’d say that two-thirds of the demonstrators were under thirty, and that can’t be bad.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement