« | Home | »

Blockupy Frankfurt

Tags: | |

Though there have been few large demonstrations in Germany against the austerity measures introduced by the European Union, it was inevitable that Frankfurt, the home of the European Central Bank, would become a target. Blockupy Frankfurt called for a series of protests and actions ‘against the austerity dictatorship’ from 16 to 19 May, culminating on Saturday in a march to the ECB. I spoke to Thomas Seibert, a philosopher and member of Blockupy Frankfurt, at the Subversive Forum in Zagreb. ‘We wanted to say there is a choice,’ he said. ‘We don’t have to stick to the German government. We wanted to say, in the Occupy sense, we are the 99 per cent.’
The authorities in Frankfurt responded by banning the march, and told the small Occupy camp around the ECB, who have been there for several months, that they had to leave. The Committee for Basic Rights and Democracy have also had their protest banned. The Frankfurt police contacted 480 people who had been kettled during a protest on 31 March to inform them that they were not allowed to enter downtown Frankfurt on Saturday. ‘You have become noticed,’ Seibert says they were told, ‘and the right to demonstrate is not for people who get noticed.’
Blockupy successfully challenged the outright ban on Saturday’s march. However, the ruling by Frankfurt’s Administrative Court contained a number of restrictions. The civic authorities demanded the names of people who would agree to be responsible for the conduct and safety of others, and the route of the march was both shortened and moved away from the area around the ECB. There are already reports of a heavy police presence, and many Metro and tram stations are closed, as are schools, universities, banks and all the offices of the city administration.
‘The city authorities and the police are helping us very much,’ Seibert says. ‘Now the Greens and the Social Democrats have to decide. If they had said you can do that, only the radical Left would come.’
As for what will happen on Saturday, it seems certain that the protestors will challenge the restrictions. Blockupy Frankfurt is part of the tradition of the Interventionist Left, which Seibert characterises as ‘finding a middle way between just peaceful marching on the streets, and then having a rally with people talking, on the one hand, and on the other this tradition by the autonomous left, small black groups attacking very hard.’ The aim is to break through police corridors and prevent kettling and other containment strategies. Seibert used the analogy of two fists heading towards one another, one representing the police, the other the protestors. ‘We call it the finger,’ he said, and explained how protestors will divide at the moment of apparent confrontation. ‘Two of the fingers will be broken by the police, but three of the fingers will come through.’

Comments on “Blockupy Frankfurt”

  1. Geoff Roberts says:

    See you there, then?

  2. Simon Wood says:

    Interestingly, so to speak, the portrait of “On War” Clausewitz, the philosopher of the battlefield, on wikipedia shows him apparently holding up two fingers. Have a look. He knew his stuff.

  3. Geoff Roberts says:

    Just got back. A lovely day for a demo, over 20,000 says the Frankfurter Allgemeine and they wouldn’t lie to us, would they? Very colourful, hundreds of different groups with a wide range of placards and banners. It was nice to see so many young people, just behind me were the Interventionist Left, with a huge banner and lots of cheeky slogans – they looked like a school class on an outing and their chants had a jolly, optimistic sound. They tried to provoke the police from time to time with chants of ‘you blockaded yourselves!’ Their own tribute to the sterling work done to keep the demonstrators out of the banking quarter yesterday. Biggest demo since the days of the Startbahn West twenty years ago and I hope to see them back on the lawn in front of the ECB on Monday. The ECB is building a huge two-tower block down by the river. I noticed yesterday that the site is heavily protected by barbed wire and a fence three metres high – just in case anybody thought of giving it a try. The FAZ photos feature our boys in black very prominently – the police of course, not the fearsome ‘black block’ that the politicians have been getting hot flushes about. At a rough estimate I’d say that two-thirds of the demonstrators were under thirty, and that can’t be bad.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement