« | Home | »

Beauty Contests


In last week’s local elections only 32 per cent of the registered electorate voted – a striking measure of how unimportant local government is to most people and a reasonable judgment on the authority of municipal government. The powers of the local state have been inexorably weakened over the last century: a process only speeded up in the 1980s. Despite the importance of local government to the Lib Dems the present government has further accelerated it. Furthermore, 32 per cent is a small and unreliable sample on which to make judgements about national politics. But here goes.

Both major parties did slightly worse than current opinion polls suggested they would – but not that much worse. The Lib Dems, with 16 per cent of the vote, did somewhat better. That, however, did not much help them overall. Their vote held up against the Conservatives, but against Labour it almost collapsed. In much of the north of England, especially the cities, the Lib Dems were Labour’s major rival. That remains the case, but they are now a feeble rival. In Scotland they did very badly. We must assume that the SNP will absorb much of the Lib Dems’ traditional Scottish vote.

The Conservatives did badly, but it seems unlikely that they lost much to Labour. They lost more to UKIP and indifference. But the idea that they can be rescued by even more right-wing policies is fanciful. The real problem is the policies that the party is at present following. Social liberalism (or authoritarianism) cannot compensate for economic policies which are simply mistaken. Or for evidence that inexperienced ministers are not up to the job. Labour did well, even outside its heartlands, but not spectacularly well. Its lead is fragile and could easily disappear over the next three years. Nevertheless, it should take the pressure off Ed Miliband for a while, though probably not for long. The press will continue its discreditable attacks on him while the Blairites will also continue to whisper in his ears Blairite ‘truths’. He should ignore them. His instincts are not bad and he should stick to them. But the lack of self-confidence is still there; the fear of the ‘markets’; the desire to reassure the rich and powerful. I doubt that these election results will make much difference to this.

As expected, the small part of the electorate that cares mostly voted against elected mayors. There is something to be said both for and against but given the limited powers even elected mayors are to have, mayoral elections would be merely beauty contests – as they now are in London where a mayor who, as his main opponent said, has done virtually nothing, seemed in some way jollier than Livingstone, who did rather a lot. But Livingstone looked and sounded shop-worn. A less compromised candidate almost certainly would have beaten Johnson. A missed opportunity. On the other hand, if Livingstone wanted the candidacy the Labour party was in no position to deny him.

Labour did remarkably in Wales (where it is an effective government and electoral machine) and surprisingly well, so we are told, in Scotland. In fact, the Scottish result was fairly predictable. The SNP vote is shaky and uncommitted, particularly in Southern and Central Scotland where Labour still looks entrenched. It performed impressively in by-elections during the 2005 parliament but lost those gains in the 2010 general election, in which Labour did astonishingly well. Something now largely forgotten. Salmond’s wooing of Murdoch presumably did not help.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • pgillott on Wishful Thinking about Climate Change: Phrases like “monumental triumph” and (particularly) “renaissance for humankind” are overdoing it, but to suggest that there is no chance of ...
    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement