« | Home | »

Livingstone’s Last Election

Tags: |

I stayed up until about 3 a.m. on Thursday night, listlessly watching the BBC coverage of the local elections in England and Wales (the graphics get more elaborate every year; the presenters more desperate in their pretence that they’re broadcasting to anyone but politicians and insomniac election nuts). But, parochially, there’s only one race I’ve been following: the London mayoral election. Ken Livingstone may be unlikeable in some people’s eyes – ‘Vote Reptilian Stalinist!’ was a rallying cry going round, only half-jokingly, on Twitter recently – but he’s been the most, some would say the only, recognisable figure in London politics for a generation. There wasn’t much going on in my life in 1986 when the Greater London Council was abolished, and since it was what the politically obsessed adults around me were talking about, it seemed worth writing down in my Hello Kitty notebook.

Livingstone has made alliances and broken them when it suited him, not least with the Labour Party, which he left before becoming mayor as an independent candidate in 2000 and then rejoined before his re-election in 2004. This time he stood on a progressive platform with attractive pledges (attractive to anyone who thinks London is not just a city for the global rich) which included restoring the Educational Maintenance Allowance for 16 to 18-year-olds and establishing a lettings agency to regulate private-sector rents. Boris Johnson, on the other hand, published his full manifesto only on Tuesday. It seems unlikely that many of the 30-odd per cent of Londoners who voted (down from an already dismal 42 per cent in 2008) read either candidate’s manifesto.

As the contest seemed to be mostly about personality, the unlikeable Livingstone – whose greatest fault, perhaps an unforgivable one in a politician, is that he doesn’t care about being liked by either voters or colleagues – could only lose. There have been many arguments about the two men’s tax arrangements, but rather fewer about last August’s riots, when Johnson, away on holiday, was nowhere to be seen for three days until he reappeared with his post-riot clean-up broom held high. It’s hardly surprising that eight out of nine other British cities have just rejected the idea of having directly elected mayors of their own.

After the redistribution of second preferences, Johnson won by only 62,538 votes, but his victory is likely to overshadow his party’s losses in many of tomorrow’s papers. During his acceptance speech, he fiddled with his cuffs and praised the ‘neo-Victorian surge’ London is experiencing – he was talking about Olympic tat, though didn’t mention the short-range missiles that are to be deployed on top of blocks of flats this summer – and joked about having ‘a non-tax-payer-funded drink’ with his defeated rival. But it was Livingstone who sounded like a statesman, and far from unlikeable. He began with the Labour Party’s gains across the country, spoke of George Osborne’s economic policies putting us back into a double-dip recession, and said that ‘today’s teenagers are the first generation… who face a worse prospect than their parents’. No national Labour figure has made the same points so plainly. But then this was, Livingstone said, his last election.

Comments on “Livingstone’s Last Election”

  1. simonpawley says:

    It probably is his last, given that by the time of the next election he will be 70, and you might have thought he would be ready by then to put his feet up. But he said four years ago that if he lost that time, he would not run again (to my knowledge, he has never explained why he changed his mind, or indeed why he said it in the first place). It seems incautious to rule anything out…

  2. alex says:

    I’ve got a soft spot for Ken, and rooted for him when first Thatcher and then Blair bullied him, and felt sorry for him when his remarks about an Evening Standard journalist were (unfairly) misconstrued to punish him. But he’s still a bare-faced serial liar. Despite having a hard anti-Boris spot, I don’t think you can say Boris lies quite so much as Ken.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement