« | Home | »

Target: Tehran

Tags: | | |

Target: Tehran by Dudu Geva.

Binyamin Netanyahu recently paid for advertising space on Facebook:

Dear citizen: In each and every generation they rise up against us to destroy us, but our enemies will fail. I invite you to join my Facebook page. Happy Passover.

After this campaign, Netanyahu’s page boasted ten times as many ‘Likes’ as that of Sheli Yechimovich, the leader of the Labor Party. But her staff revealed that only 17 per cent of them were from Israelis. More than half were from Americans, and 5000 were from admirers in Indonesia.

‘Our enemies’ at the moment means Iran. Last month, the Wiesenthal Center sent a letter to donors, quoting an independent Iranian blogger, as if he had any influence on the government, and including an ‘extermination map’ of Israel, which the blogger had taken from Wikipedia. I asked Efraim Zurrof, the centre’s representative in Israel, what he thought of the letter. ‘You know how it is in America,’ he said. ‘All organisations work like that.’

At the same time, two Israeli designers, Roni Edry and Michal Tamir, set up a Facebook page called ‘Israel loves Iran’, an antiwar initiative to bring ordinary Israelis and Iranians together on the social networking site. It now has more than 60,000 ‘Likes’. An Israeli tech company set up a video chat application for Iranians and Israelis to talk to each other.

The right-wing Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon, meanwhile, asked a few experts to simulate the outcome of an Israeli strike on Iran’s ‘extermination reactors’ in a war game. They thought it would be a resounding success for Israel, even without American help. Well, maybe.

Makor Rishon was definitely right about one thing though: the Israeli media will unequivocally support any strike that is carried out, at least to start with. That’s how it is with all Israeli wars. Still, the country’s leading TV satire, Eretz Nehederet (‘Wonderful Country’), has been showing a series of sketches in which two reasonable and sympathetic Iranians are worried about the dangerous lunatics in Israel who want to wipe them out. The program’s creator, Muli Segev, has spoken out against attacking Iran. The antiwar message of the sketches might be clearer, however, if the Iranians weren’t nuclear scientists.

I am one of the curators (with Joshua Simon and Ari Libsker) of Iran, a show at the Spaceship gallery in Tel Aviv. The exhibits include a wax effigy of Ehud Barak by Ari Libsker and Anna Appel calledThe Most Dangerous Person in the World, and a mockumentary about the Israeli Air Force attacking Poland by Ofry Ilani and Yotam Feldman. We had to move Guy Briller’s installation on the roof of the gallery, Nimrod Direct, so it didn’t look like a missile pointing at the US embassy over the road.

Some of the works in the exhibition are genuine documents, including a pamphlet delivered to every postbox in my apartment building. It shows a scary photo of Ahmadinejad, asks: ‘Are you securing the safety of your loved ones?’ – and offers for sale a device that claims to protect you against unconventional weapons. 

Comments on “Target: Tehran”

  1. Pennywhistler says:

    Yeah yeah yeah.

    Still, the primary fact to remeber is that Iran has declared itself to be the enemy of Israel and has vowed to wipe the “Zionists” off the face of the Earth (however you choose to define that).

    You are gambling that the Iranian mullahs are sane.

    And remember that their Shiite religion worships martyrs and martyrdom.

    You are gambling that the Iranian mullahs are not willing to sacrifice 20% of their population to totally destroy the Jewish state.

    You are gambling that they will not use their nuclear umbrella to defend their partners Hezbollah, Hamas and the Gazans, Lebanese and Syrians as THEY rain destruction on Israel.

    We see what the Syrian government is capable of. On their own citizens from a different ethnic group.

    I have no idea what’s on their minds. Do you?

    I have no idea what’s on the Iranian mullah’s minds. Do you?

    What if you bet wrong?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement