« | Home | »

Royal Woolwich


At 6.15 on Friday evening, Henry VIII (played by the bloke who impersonates him at Hampton Court) led a procession of local politicians down the steps of Greenwich’s council offices. In front of a crowd of a few hundred people, they announced that Greenwich had been accorded royal status by the queen in honour of its ‘longstanding royal connections’. It’s only the fourth borough to be given the title (after Kensington and Chelsea, Windsor and Maidenhead, and Kingston upon Thames), and the first for more than a hundred years. It’s almost surprising it didn’t happen earlier: Greenwich is the birthplace of Tudor kings, home to Wren’s Royal Naval College, the National Observatory and the National Maritime Museum (where in the summer David Starkey will be curating an exhibition called Royal River: Power, Pageantry and the Thames), and a Unesco World Heritage Site regularly used by Hollywood to shoot historical scenes of a vanished England.

But the borough, the tenth most deprived in London, is a lot bigger than ‘historic’ Greenwich. The council offices are in Woolwich Town Hall (the metropolitan boroughs of Greenwich and Woolwich were amalgamated in 1965). After the royal charter was delivered, bursting pomegranates of fireworks, exploding in time to ‘Rule Britannia’ and ‘Land of Hope and Glory’, illuminated a landscape of mean Victorian houses and dull 1960s blocks, betting shops (three in a row), a pawn broker, The African Cash-and-Carry, the boarded-up remains of a pub destroyed in the riots.

I asked a publican in Woolwich what he thought of the borough’s new royal status. ‘Maybe it will push up property prices,’ he said. ‘It could be good for rebranding the area,’ a fruit-and-veg seller thought. ‘Regeneration’ is the council’s watchword (they refer to the riots as ‘the unpleasantness’): Europe’s largest Tesco is being built in Woolwich; a new housing development of ‘Manhattan Style Apartments’, behind the walls of the Arsenal, hopes to attract the Canary Wharf crowd.

Yet Greenwich wouldn’t be Greenwich if it weren’t for Woolwich, despite its lack of tourist attractions and scant mention in Lord Sterling’s ‘case for a royal borough’. Henry VIII had his pleasure palace at Greenwich, but he established the dockyard to build his giant warship Henry Grace à Dieu, the largest in Europe, at Woolwich. (The dockyard closed down in 1869, half a century after the HMS Beagle was launched there.) The grandiloquent 18th-century Painted Hall at the Royal Naval College in Greenwich celebrates the expansion of Britain’s empire, but the soldiers who won those wars were barracked at Woolwich, and their armaments were made at Woolwich Arsenal – a sprawling, secretive mini-city with tens of thousands of workers, its own timetabled railway and canal. Occasionally weapons would accidentally explode, killing workers and lighting up the sky over South-East London. So in many ways it was fitting that the fireworks on Friday went up over Woolwich, the back-room workshop to Greenwich’s front-of-shop window display.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement