« | Home | »

Lansley’s Delusions

Tags: |

Andrew Lansley’s Health and Social Care Bill, due to return to the Lords next month, is looking less and less well. A poll of more than 2500 GPs carried out by the RCGP found that 98 per cent were in favour of rejecting the bill if the other Royal Colleges agreed. When Ed Miliband challenged David Cameron with these figures on Wednesday, the prime minister responded by claiming the reforms were not only supported but being enthusiastically implemented by one Dr Greg Conner, a GP from Miliband’s Doncaster constituency. A spokesman for Doncaster Primary Care Trust later told GP newspaper that ‘Dr Conner was no longer chairman of the Doncaster clinical commissiong group and he had in fact left the area.’

There are even Tories who don’t like the bill. The Health Select Committee, chaired by the former Conservative health secretary Stephen Dorrell, has criticised it for imposing structural changes on the NHS that make it worse, not better, at saving money:

The reorganisation process continues to complicate the push for efficiency gains. Although it may have facilitated savings in some cases, we heard that it more often creates disruption and distraction that hinders the ability of organisations to consider truly effective ways of reforming service delivery and releasing savings.

Meanwhile, the medical profession had at last got itself together to present an (almost) united front in opposition to the bill. The Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of Midwives last week joined the British Medical Association in calling for the bill to be withdrawn. And according to a report in the Guardian, all but one of the Medical Royal Colleges had come out in opposition. The Academy of the Medical Royal Colleges had drafted a statement that was to have been released on Wednesday, saying that the Bill, as it stands, ‘may widen rather than lessen health inequalities and that unnecessary competition will undermine the provision of high-quality integrated care to patients.’

The doctors’ revolt was to have culminated last night in a summit meeting of the BMA, RCN and AOMRC, called by the BMA leader, Hamish Meldrum. But the AOMRC withdrew its statement after Lansley apparently made a series of desperate phone calls to the heads of several of the Royal Colleges, promising to act on their concerns.

With his usual grace and diplomacy, Lansley has responded to doctors’ criticisms by insulting their leadership and comparing himself to Aneurin Bevan, as if destroying the NHS were an achievement equal to founding it. In a prepared speech delivered at the launch of a children’s health initiative in Liverpool, Lansley quoted Bevan’s remark that the BMA were ‘politically poisoned people’, and added:

Sometimes change is hard. Sometimes, you can’t expect unanimity. Sometimes the right thing to do is keep listening, keep making your case, keep calm.

But will he carry on?

Comments on “Lansley’s Delusions”

  1. harr20jj says:

    What should be troubling Lansley isn’t the lack of unanimity, but rather how perilously close he is to the sort of unanimity he must surely have hoped to avoid.

  2. Doomlord says:

    Will he be allowed to carry on is the more relevant question. The fact is Cameron is praying for Chris Huhne to have to resign over his driving shenanigans, thereby triggering a reshuffle in which Lansley can be quietly put out of our misery.

  3. GPdoc says:

    If you think the NHS can just carry on unchanged, that PCTs do a great job, can I ask what colour the sky is on your planet ?
    If all GPs are so opposed to commissioning, who do you think are running hundreds of commissioning groups across the country ?

    • semitone says:

      I read this piece again to make sure, but I still can’t find it. Can you show us where in the article it says “the NHS can carry on unchanged, PCTs do a great job, and all GPs are opposed to commissioning?”

  4. hullister says:

    Since PCTs have already – and illegally, in that to do so was to anticipate a change in the rules that has yet to be passed into law – been dismantled to a greater or lesser extent, who are we to imagine will be doing the commissioning if not the GPs? The NHS can’t be left in limbo while the Westminster farce lurches on.
    The govt response throughout has been on the level of half-truths that Cameron produced last week, and has never honestly responded to the charge that the future is commercial and competitive – since we are going to have to pay for this through taxes, the result will be worse than privatisation.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement