« | Home | »

A Small Town in Germany

Tags: |

On 4 November 2011, the police finally tracked down two men who were wanted for questioning in connection with at least 14 bank raids in towns across East Germany. Uwe Böhnhardt and Uwe Mundlos were found dead in a camping bus in Eisenach, along with a pistol that had been used to kill at least nine men between 1999 and 2007. Eight of the victims were of Turkish origin, the ninth was born in Greece. The authorities had not previously considered that the murders might be racially motivated: racist attacks are often explained away by the police as ‘drunken brawls over private issues’. Official data put the number of racially motivated murders in Germany since 1990 at 48, but activist groups and journalists say the figure is closer to 140.

On 11 November, after a fire in a flat in Zwickau, a small town 150 km east of Eisenach, the police found evidence linking the woman who had rented the flat to Böhnhardt and Mundlos, and a pistol originally issued to a policewoman who had been shot in April 2007 in Heilbronn, 300 km south-west of Zwickau. There was also a DVD documenting the nine murders and a homemade board game based on them.

By mid-November it was clear that Böhnhardt and Mundlos were responsible for the deaths of at least ten people, and had carried out a large number of bank raids. Documents revealed that they were members of a group calling itself the National Socialist Underground (NSU), which the police had apparently never heard of. But neo-Nazi sympathisers must have supplied Böhnhardt and Mundlos with cash, cars, documents and accommodation, and the search began for these supporters.

It has since emerged that the security services had been watching the NSU since 1998, when they found explosives in a garage used by the cell. Somehow, the men escaped and went into hiding – at least that was the official version of events, but evidence now indicates that the security services were in close contact with the group but didn’t keep the police informed about their activities.

It seems likely that the National Democratic Party (NPD), which openly proclaims racist policies, has informal contacts with members of such cells as the Zwickau NSU. Gerhard Schroeder’s government tried in 2003 to have the NPD banned by the Federal Supreme Court but the application was rejected when the judges learned that around 20 per cent of the party leadership were paid informants of the security services.

The German intelligence services don’t reveal classified information or the names of their moles to the police forces at national or local level. A senior police officer said in December that a meeting with the intelligence services in his region consisted of them giving him all the reasons they could not give him any relevant information on neo-Nazi cells. A ‘Co-ordination Centre on Right-Wing Extremism’ has now been established at national level to pool information on neo-Nazi groups and their activities, but to judge by the results of the work of the intelligence services in the past there’s no reason to think that the incidence of racial violence will now decrease. One of their paid informants was present when Halit K. was killed by Böhnhardt and Mundlos in an internet café in 2006. His nickname in the service was ‘Little Adolf’ and he had a copy of Mein Kampf at home.

In the wake of the revelations about the Zwickau NSU cell, politicians now plan to keep a closer watch on such groups and the national government intends to raise the issue of the legality of the NPD before the Federal Supreme Court again – a difficult task in itself, and quite what it would achieve is unclear. There is an argument that it would simply drive the activists underground and make it more difficult to monitor them. To improve the effectiveness of the undercover work the liberal minister of justice has suggested reducing the number of intelligence services, but they are under the control of the local state authorities which are unlikely to give them up.

According to a study conducted by the Friedrich Ebert Society in 2010, 39 per cent of German adults believe that migrants ‘constitute a danger to the stability of the country’ and ‘come to Germany to live off social security’; 15 per cent believe that ‘Jews do not belong’ in Germany. These views were expressed by members of all social groups and by supporters of all of the political parties.

Comments on “A Small Town in Germany”

  1. outofdate says:

    The 39 per cent does surprise me, but I wish they’d broken it up by region and age rather than class and political affiliation. Like everyone else I have my suspicions about people who aren’t from here and would therefore guess that the sentiment is more widespread in the south and east.

    In fairness, the form it takes in the non-neo-Nazi population, as far as I can tell, is that if a Turkish woman in a headscarf were to get on a bus and ask where it’s going, the old woman on that single seat to the right of the driver would tut loudly, the driver would tell her (with bad grace), and then when she was gone they would sourly agree with one another that she should have consulted the Fahrplan, which clearly lists the stops in alternating grey and white for optimum readability. Now, that is on the one hand disgusting but on the other the way Germans tend to behave to one another as well, and thus simply the culture and not necessarily the Road to Belsen.

  2. c.e.w. says:

    Not directly relevant but I was reminded by outofdate’s scenario of Pepe Danquart’s 1993 short Schwarzfahrer

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement