« | Home | »

A Small Town in Germany

Tags: |

On 4 November 2011, the police finally tracked down two men who were wanted for questioning in connection with at least 14 bank raids in towns across East Germany. Uwe Böhnhardt and Uwe Mundlos were found dead in a camping bus in Eisenach, along with a pistol that had been used to kill at least nine men between 1999 and 2007. Eight of the victims were of Turkish origin, the ninth was born in Greece. The authorities had not previously considered that the murders might be racially motivated: racist attacks are often explained away by the police as ‘drunken brawls over private issues’. Official data put the number of racially motivated murders in Germany since 1990 at 48, but activist groups and journalists say the figure is closer to 140.

On 11 November, after a fire in a flat in Zwickau, a small town 150 km east of Eisenach, the police found evidence linking the woman who had rented the flat to Böhnhardt and Mundlos, and a pistol originally issued to a policewoman who had been shot in April 2007 in Heilbronn, 300 km south-west of Zwickau. There was also a DVD documenting the nine murders and a homemade board game based on them.

By mid-November it was clear that Böhnhardt and Mundlos were responsible for the deaths of at least ten people, and had carried out a large number of bank raids. Documents revealed that they were members of a group calling itself the National Socialist Underground (NSU), which the police had apparently never heard of. But neo-Nazi sympathisers must have supplied Böhnhardt and Mundlos with cash, cars, documents and accommodation, and the search began for these supporters.

It has since emerged that the security services had been watching the NSU since 1998, when they found explosives in a garage used by the cell. Somehow, the men escaped and went into hiding – at least that was the official version of events, but evidence now indicates that the security services were in close contact with the group but didn’t keep the police informed about their activities.

It seems likely that the National Democratic Party (NPD), which openly proclaims racist policies, has informal contacts with members of such cells as the Zwickau NSU. Gerhard Schroeder’s government tried in 2003 to have the NPD banned by the Federal Supreme Court but the application was rejected when the judges learned that around 20 per cent of the party leadership were paid informants of the security services.

The German intelligence services don’t reveal classified information or the names of their moles to the police forces at national or local level. A senior police officer said in December that a meeting with the intelligence services in his region consisted of them giving him all the reasons they could not give him any relevant information on neo-Nazi cells. A ‘Co-ordination Centre on Right-Wing Extremism’ has now been established at national level to pool information on neo-Nazi groups and their activities, but to judge by the results of the work of the intelligence services in the past there’s no reason to think that the incidence of racial violence will now decrease. One of their paid informants was present when Halit K. was killed by Böhnhardt and Mundlos in an internet café in 2006. His nickname in the service was ‘Little Adolf’ and he had a copy of Mein Kampf at home.

In the wake of the revelations about the Zwickau NSU cell, politicians now plan to keep a closer watch on such groups and the national government intends to raise the issue of the legality of the NPD before the Federal Supreme Court again – a difficult task in itself, and quite what it would achieve is unclear. There is an argument that it would simply drive the activists underground and make it more difficult to monitor them. To improve the effectiveness of the undercover work the liberal minister of justice has suggested reducing the number of intelligence services, but they are under the control of the local state authorities which are unlikely to give them up.

According to a study conducted by the Friedrich Ebert Society in 2010, 39 per cent of German adults believe that migrants ‘constitute a danger to the stability of the country’ and ‘come to Germany to live off social security’; 15 per cent believe that ‘Jews do not belong’ in Germany. These views were expressed by members of all social groups and by supporters of all of the political parties.

Comments on “A Small Town in Germany”

  1. outofdate says:

    The 39 per cent does surprise me, but I wish they’d broken it up by region and age rather than class and political affiliation. Like everyone else I have my suspicions about people who aren’t from here and would therefore guess that the sentiment is more widespread in the south and east.

    In fairness, the form it takes in the non-neo-Nazi population, as far as I can tell, is that if a Turkish woman in a headscarf were to get on a bus and ask where it’s going, the old woman on that single seat to the right of the driver would tut loudly, the driver would tell her (with bad grace), and then when she was gone they would sourly agree with one another that she should have consulted the Fahrplan, which clearly lists the stops in alternating grey and white for optimum readability. Now, that is on the one hand disgusting but on the other the way Germans tend to behave to one another as well, and thus simply the culture and not necessarily the Road to Belsen.

  2. c.e.w. says:

    Not directly relevant but I was reminded by outofdate’s scenario of Pepe Danquart’s 1993 short Schwarzfahrer

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement