« | Home | »

Third-Rate Stamps

Tags: | |

By unlucky coincidence, the Royal Mail launched this year’s set of Christmas stamps the day before the Leonardo da Vinci exhibition opened at the National Gallery. On one hand, both versions of The Virgin of the Rocks in the same room; on the other, to ‘celebrate the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible’, Mary looking like one of the Bisto kids, but more inane, with her head wrapped in an ethnically imprecise white cloth, covering her hair but knotted oddly at the back. That’s on the first-class stamp, purporting to illustrate Matthew 1.23 (‘Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son’). The larger version shows a dove, apparently perched on a Windsor chair.

On the second-class stamp, a bulky lilac-clad angel hovers above the sleeping Joseph. The reference is to Matthew 1.21. Biblical scholars may notice that this incident is in fact described in verse 20, but I leave that to them; it’s the aesthetics that bother me. I asked a recent art school graduate, now working in book design, if this was stylish retro of a sort that had passed me by. Apparently not. The 2011 ‘King James Bible’ stamps don’t even have the distinction of harking back to the golden days of Ladybird Books.

Comments on “Third-Rate Stamps”

  1. alex says:

    I’m surprised the LRB didn’t discuss the more important issue of whether we should have religion on our stamps. As for the designs I think they are really cool and the above post is just a moan, off-target in more than one place:
    About the verse being wrong – the image could perfectly well represent Matthew 1.21, which continues the direct speech addressed by the angel to Joseph from the previous verse.
    And what kind of criticism is ‘ethnically imprecise’? Many classic representations of the Virgin are also technically subject to that observation but the Christian message is not an ethnic one so it’s about the least relevant thing to say about such an image.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement