« | Home | »

Would you buy a used car from this man?

Tags: | |

The story so far, in case you missed it, is that US authorities have announced that an Iranian-American car salesman, Manssor Arbabsiar, tried to enlist a DEA informant to commit mass murder in the mistaken belief that he was a hitman working for a Mexican drug cartel. One of the crimes Arbabsiar is alleged to have had in mind was the murder of the Saudi envoy in Washington, Adel al-Jubeir.

‘What we know is that an individual of Iranian-American descent was involved in a plot to assassinate the ambassador to the United States from Saudi Arabia,’ President Obama said at a press conference on 13 October. ‘And we also know that he had direct links, was paid by and directed by individuals in the Iranian government.’ Peter King, a right-wing Republican congressman, called the plot an ‘act of war’. Vice-President Joe Biden said that ‘all options are on the table’.

In an interview with al-Jazeera this week, President Ahmadinejad denied the allegations and said the evidence was ‘probably fabricated’. Well he would, wouldn’t he. But plenty of observers agree that the alleged plot doesn’t fit with the Quds Force’s usual way of doing things.

Everyone has bad days, but why would any bona fide secret agent, even some kind of rogue operative, who went to Mexico apparently for deniability, volunteer so much information about his background, mission and accomplices to the hitman he was hiring? If Arbabsiar were a trained agent working for the Quds Force, would he be dimwitted enough to think that money wired from Iran to a Mexican drug cartel wouldn’t attract the attention of the US authorities? When Arbabsiar discusses buying a car with his alleged handler in Iran, investigators claim that he is confirming the plan to kill al-Jubeir. But is it really plausible that a senior Quds Force leader would give orders to kill the Saudi ambassador, even in code, on an open phone line to the United States?

One analyst, reading between the lines of the amended criminal complaint, has argued that the DEA informant may have suggested killing al-Jubeir to Arbabsiar, rather than the other way round. Whoever’s idea it was, the murder would make little strategic sense for Iran. Attempting to assassinate the ambassador, in Washington of all places, would be taking a huge risk for a relatively minor target, who isn’t even a member of the royal family. Whatever the truth behind the ‘plot’, the only certainty is that the fallout from it has further damaged relations between Iran and the United States, to the satisfaction of hardliners on both sides.

Comments on “Would you buy a used car from this man?”

  1. outofdate says:

    Every few years the Americans ‘uncover’ a plot by a regime the Saudis dislike to kill some senior Saudi figure, invariably, like the alien landings, in the American heartland. In the Bush era this didn’t have to go very far because you could just get an unnamed official to brief the New York Times and then let it sort of ferment (Gaddafi’s son tried to kill King Abdullah, I think was the last one, with the help of an Islamist dissident in London who was also giving Riyadh grief). Now these briefings won’t wash any more, so you have to bring a bogus indictment, which seems risky but proves that the Obama administration is in every way the same as the previous one, the Saudi-U.S. alliance is the rock on which it’s founded, and the world’s going to Hell in a handcart.

  2. encle says:

    an Iranian secret agent and a Mexican drug dealer in a foiled plot on America? Who are they kidding, this one’s going straight to dvd …

    but seriously, I blame the moneymen http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n02/charles-simic/diary

  3. BuzzK says:

    This is very serious for American security.
    It reminds me of the crisis in the 1980’s when these terrorists sold arms to Iran to fund Nicaragua Contra rebels.
    Oh wait…bad example.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement