« | Home | »

Would you buy a used car from this man?

Tags: | |

The story so far, in case you missed it, is that US authorities have announced that an Iranian-American car salesman, Manssor Arbabsiar, tried to enlist a DEA informant to commit mass murder in the mistaken belief that he was a hitman working for a Mexican drug cartel. One of the crimes Arbabsiar is alleged to have had in mind was the murder of the Saudi envoy in Washington, Adel al-Jubeir.

‘What we know is that an individual of Iranian-American descent was involved in a plot to assassinate the ambassador to the United States from Saudi Arabia,’ President Obama said at a press conference on 13 October. ‘And we also know that he had direct links, was paid by and directed by individuals in the Iranian government.’ Peter King, a right-wing Republican congressman, called the plot an ‘act of war’. Vice-President Joe Biden said that ‘all options are on the table’.

In an interview with al-Jazeera this week, President Ahmadinejad denied the allegations and said the evidence was ‘probably fabricated’. Well he would, wouldn’t he. But plenty of observers agree that the alleged plot doesn’t fit with the Quds Force’s usual way of doing things.

Everyone has bad days, but why would any bona fide secret agent, even some kind of rogue operative, who went to Mexico apparently for deniability, volunteer so much information about his background, mission and accomplices to the hitman he was hiring? If Arbabsiar were a trained agent working for the Quds Force, would he be dimwitted enough to think that money wired from Iran to a Mexican drug cartel wouldn’t attract the attention of the US authorities? When Arbabsiar discusses buying a car with his alleged handler in Iran, investigators claim that he is confirming the plan to kill al-Jubeir. But is it really plausible that a senior Quds Force leader would give orders to kill the Saudi ambassador, even in code, on an open phone line to the United States?

One analyst, reading between the lines of the amended criminal complaint, has argued that the DEA informant may have suggested killing al-Jubeir to Arbabsiar, rather than the other way round. Whoever’s idea it was, the murder would make little strategic sense for Iran. Attempting to assassinate the ambassador, in Washington of all places, would be taking a huge risk for a relatively minor target, who isn’t even a member of the royal family. Whatever the truth behind the ‘plot’, the only certainty is that the fallout from it has further damaged relations between Iran and the United States, to the satisfaction of hardliners on both sides.

Comments on “Would you buy a used car from this man?”

  1. outofdate says:

    Every few years the Americans ‘uncover’ a plot by a regime the Saudis dislike to kill some senior Saudi figure, invariably, like the alien landings, in the American heartland. In the Bush era this didn’t have to go very far because you could just get an unnamed official to brief the New York Times and then let it sort of ferment (Gaddafi’s son tried to kill King Abdullah, I think was the last one, with the help of an Islamist dissident in London who was also giving Riyadh grief). Now these briefings won’t wash any more, so you have to bring a bogus indictment, which seems risky but proves that the Obama administration is in every way the same as the previous one, the Saudi-U.S. alliance is the rock on which it’s founded, and the world’s going to Hell in a handcart.

  2. encle says:

    an Iranian secret agent and a Mexican drug dealer in a foiled plot on America? Who are they kidding, this one’s going straight to dvd …

    but seriously, I blame the moneymen http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n02/charles-simic/diary

  3. BuzzK says:

    This is very serious for American security.
    It reminds me of the crisis in the 1980’s when these terrorists sold arms to Iran to fund Nicaragua Contra rebels.
    Oh wait…bad example.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement