« | Home | »

Read it or be deported

Tags: |

On Saturday I sat the ‘Life in the UK’ test, a requirement for foreign nationals who want to apply for citizenship or permanent leave to remain. My nearest test centre was in a dingy basement off the Essex Road. The fluorescent lights weren’t doing very well. The invigilators were stone-faced, a bit rude. I’d been forbidden from talking to or looking at my fellow immigrants, about 20 people, mostly men. While waiting for the test to begin all I had to look at was the cover of my American passport.

The test questions are taken from a handbook produced by the Home Office, Life in the United Kingdom: A Journey to Citizenship, a perennial bestseller: read it or be deported. The exam I took had questions about England’s patron saint, Scottish bank notes, TV licences, the number of countries in the Commonwealth. I had to know what percentage of the population is made up of children, and whether Wales has more people than Northern Ireland.

Almost a quarter of the exam was about benefits, as if to make sure I knew that I was entitled to free healthcare, and under what conditions I could claim free prescriptions, dental care, sight tests and glasses. Other questions made sure I knew how to claim Jobseeker’s Allowance and how to make a complaint for unfair dismissal or to report sexual harassment. ‘A person cannot be refused work, training or promotion because of their sex’ – true or false?

We all passed.

Last week David Cameron announced that this wouldn’t do:

There’s a whole chapter in the citizenship handbook on British history but incredibly there are no questions on British history in the actual test. Instead you’ll find questions on the roles and powers of the main institutions of Europe and the benefits system within the UK. So we are going to revise the whole test and put British history and culture at the heart of it.

The current chapter on British history hurtles from Stonehenge to New Labour (it was published in 2007), and ends ringingly:

The United Kingdom is perhaps more socially mobile and less class conscious than it was in the past… The UK is also a more pluralistic society than it was 100 years ago, both in ethnic and religious terms. Postwar immigration means that nearly 10 per cent of the population has a parent or grandparent born outside the UK. Racism remains a problem in some areas, although it is actively combated both in opinion and in law and most people believe that it has diminished. The UK has been a multi-national and multi-cultural society for a long time, without this being a threat to its British identity, or its English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish cultural and national identities.

The Home Office is presumably at work on a new version.

Comments on “Read it or be deported”

  1. Geoff Roberts says:

    What the ….? Oh, you’re American so that explains it. Be warned; an English-born friend of mine who now lives in Florida “starts complaining before he gets off the plane at Heath Row”, according to his son.

  2. Harry Stopes says:

    I think one should be wary of feeling too comfortable anywhere. Still, congratulations and welcome I guess. Now see how you get on with the real thing: http://realcitizenshiptest.co.uk/quiz.php?n=1

  3. rwhalley says:

    I got 7 out of 10 on the ‘real’ test.
    British born and bred, but I have been living in the americas for the past 23 years.
    Who the hell are Ant and Dec?
    The U.S. test was dead easy. Aced it!

  4. willharwood says:

    Surely the correct answer to Which one is Ant and which Dec is “I don’t know”. No one does.

  5. Chris Rose says:

    Ant is always on the left, Dec on the right. Perhaps Cameron and Clegg could adopt a similar strategy.

  6. Phil Edwards says:

    Ant and Dec read left to right – there’s Ant, there’s Dec. Always. You’ll never see a photograph where they’re apart, or where they’re positioned any other way.

    I got 9/10; I prefer my chips with just salt. (Or sometimes even with mayonnaise.)

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement