« | Home | »

Unfunny Bedroom Farce

Tags: | |

As Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s humiliation in New York levels out into web-chat and news about the news, the undead are on the move. You saw nothing with fangs, in a cape, hovering in the near distance when the fourth estate held up the mirror to human nature in the wake of the gruesome Sofitel encounter? That’s because it didn’t cast a reflection. The internet, which never sleeps, has made it clearer now: the real beast in this story is racism.

Earlier this month, SlateAfrique asked a range of punters and luminaries in the US and France what would have happened if Nafissatou Diallo, the Sofitel maid, had been ‘a blue-eyed blonde’. Two Diallos, one of them a cousin, another who runs a café in Harlem, were confident things would have come out differently. Diallo 1: ‘They wouldn’t have thrown her in the dustbin the way they did.’ Diallo 2: ‘If she’d been white and Jewish, she wouldn’t have had that kind of treatment.’ And later: ‘The whole Jewish lobby is behind it.’

Really? So it’s not just a case of ordinary white-and-black racism: there’s also a conspiracy of Jews. Strauss-Kahn is a magnet for anti-semitism. Check RadioIslam, long before the Sofitel affair, on DSK and other influential Jews in France. Move the cursor west, post-Sofitel, and catch the ghastly glow from the economics department at George Mason University alerting readers to ‘the depraved nature of any rich, socialist Jew who would ruthlessly ravage a poor, devout Muslim maid’.

Here are a few impartial details about DSK. He has been a fierce supporter of Israel for forty years. In the late 1970s he was one of the founders of Socialisme et Judaïsme, set up to bring French Jewish voters to the Parti socialiste and build support for Israel. He and his wife Anne Sinclair are honorary members of the Léon Blum circle, an anti-populist Republican association whose less publicised aim is a rearguard action against dwindling support for Israel on the French left. (Alain Geismar, one of the former leaders of the Maoist GP, or Proletarian Left, is also an honorary member.) On the Sofitel affair: Ben Brafman, DSK’s defence attorney in New York, is another Israel stalwart. You can listen to him on the Israeli consulate website (NYC) explaining that if the Israelis wanted to wipe every inhabitant of Gaza off the map, they could, but they haven’t, so hats off to Israel for restraint. But from there to a conspiracy?

Whatever was asked of DSK in this unfunny bedroom farce, his wardrobe was simple: lounge suit or birthday suit. But the press and the lawyers ran Diallo offstage left and onstage right at a frantic pace, always with a complicated costume change. First she was a cleaner in a Sofitel apron, going about her business with lowered eyes, surprised by an incontinent guest. Then she had to play it again in oriental style as a Muslim maid violated by a Jew. In re-enactment three, the pageant, she starred as Africa south of the Sahara – Diallo as 800 million people, forced to their knees by the IMF in a parable about conditional lending. (In the same scene, DSK – a reformer during his time at the Fund – reverts, in the manner of Mr Kurtz.)

At length, under pressure from Brafman’s legal team, Diallo was kitted out in rags and shoved on as a witch who’d charmed her way into the West. Hadn’t she tried to lodge a bogus asylum claim? Hadn’t she already cried rape in her enchantment of US immigration, destroying all traces of her broomstick and flushing her muti down the toilet of the airliner? To cap it all, wasn’t she a petty lowlife – enter Diallo, finally, in a tracksuit with a tote bag full of cellphones – plotting with a jailed boyfriend hours after the scene in the hotel?

In France there’s a lingering suspicion that Strauss-Kahn was set up. His pyrotechnic drives are legendary: did an enemy light the blue touch-paper and retire? But the test of the race angle lies elsewhere. This week a longstanding claim by the writer Tristane Banon that DSK tried to rape her during an interview in 2003 went to the wire, as accuser and accused appeared together before police investigators in Paris. (She says he never looked at her during the two-hour meeting.) One way the law could take it from here would be to appoint a judge with a view to a rape trial. Another would be to flip the case into the archive, having concluded that this was not rape, but ‘sexual aggression’. A complaint of sexual aggression must be lodged within three years of the day in question, meaning that Banon’s would be five years past its judge-by date.

The smart money says there will be no criminal trial. If so, that’s a stake through the heart of the race reading: Banon is not some marginal from Guinea who can be kicked into the long grass, she is a class act from Neuilly-sur-Seine. But if the case did go forward, SlateAfrique’s question would begin to look like an astute one and there’d be many more voices to take up the cry of racism.

Comments on “Unfunny Bedroom Farce”

  1. And if DSK had been a poor, Jewish window-cleaner molested by a bored rich Saudi housewife? He might have had trouble making the charge stick, too. I’m sure race plays its part here, as does gender, but in this game of stone, scissors, paper it’s ‘class’ (wealth and power) that trumps the others every time!

  2. Izak Friend says:

    African Muslims from Jew-less regions agree with South Asian Muslims, that the Jews are behind all of their difficulties in life. The author is demonstrating the penetration of Islam-based antisemitism in global Islamic populations.

    Antisemites like to see their own hatreds verified by Third World peasants. Go figure.

  3. hmees says:

    Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s lawyers did not disclose any facts about Ms. Diallo that led to the dismissal of the case. And Ms. Diallo did not lie on her asylum application about being gang-raped, which by all means would have been excusable. She made the whole story about the gang rape up on the spot, showing scars she supposedly incurred and giving a precise number of the soldiers who attacked her. Two weeks later she told prosecutors she made the whole story up. And on her asylum application there was no mention of rape, as she claimed.

  4. outofdate says:

    It really is a very good story, the more it goes on the onner it sort of goes. Now the author is demonstrating the penetration of Islam-based antisemitism in global Islamic populations, and Saudi housewives are molesting Jewish window cleaners. Whatever next?

  5. Izak Friend says:

    The author repeats a great deal of antisemitic gossip in a tone of levity because antisemitic gossip is significant and hilarious.

    Some details are distorted. (1)Diallo did not claim a gang-rape on her asylum application. She rehearsed a gang-rape claim from a CD that someone gave her, but did not use it. 2)The burden of proof is on the accuser, not on the accused. 3)New York State, which set out to destroy DSK is much richer than Anne Sinclair. 4)Diallo’s complaint cost DSK his job, his future plans, and a million dollars in defense-related fees. 5)Banon is, by her own account, more opportunist than offended virtue, who lay in wait, calculating costs:benefits, until Diallo made DSK vulnerable.

    More disturbing to this reader than the distortions and levity, is the paragraph which begins with “impartial details.” DSK the Jew belongs to Jewish organizations, which support Jewish causes, including the Jewish refugee state in Israel. And, so does his lawyer— meaning that DSK and his lawyer are probably on the same side. What an outrage. Sound the alarms. Gentiles are in danger. Conspiracy.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement