« | Home | »

The Case for More MPs

Tags:

The late Bernard Weatherill told me that between 1964, when he entered the House of Commons, and the late 1980s, his constituency duties increased twentyfold. It’s one of the reasons backbenchers spend less time arguing and being difficult in the chamber than they once did. When Tony Blair had a large majority he put Labour members on a rota for extra constituency duties. Reducing the number of MPs will only make the situation worse: David Cameron’s Commons-slighting venture cringes to populist prejudice. Yet as the recent Murdoch-grilling showed, a committee of backbench MPs can still make creditable difficulties. To discourage them, Louise Mensch has already been slashed at by the red-tops; perhaps Tom Watson and Chris Bryant will be redistributed. Nothing about recent governments suggests that the problem has been rank and file members (of any party), but they make an easy scapegoat.

Comments on “The Case for More MPs”

  1. philodemus says:

    This appears to be an argument for more staff, rather than more MPs. Compare the US House of Representatives, which though evidently dysfunctional is reasonably responsive on constituency issues.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Timothy Rogers on In Philadelphia: The closing sentence of this report is true, and very ominous at that. The critical question then becomes, of the voters who actually turn out in Nov...
    • Charles Turner on England, Secede!: The arguments for brexit were dominated by the alleged need to control immigration. Wouldn't there have to be a serious physical border - a fence - b...
    • Locus on England, Secede!: People in Ireland really hate it when people from Britain (or Jersey, I guess) use the term "Eire." They think it sounds outdated, inaccurate and cond...
    • bggilmore on Cleveland, Day Two: I cruised through Atlantic City, New Jersey recently. Trump has some dead casinos there. He doesn't own them and yet his name is still on the building...
    • Timothy Rogers on Cleveland, Day Three: The question isn't her lying (she's an amateur compared to Trump on this front), but whether or not she's more suitable (and less dangerous) than Trum...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement