« | Home | »

Not just one of your holiday games

Tags: | |

French law requires that a purebred dog or cat – that is, an animal belonging to one of the breeds listed in the Livre des origines français or the Livre officiel des origins felines – be given a name beginning with a prescribed letter of the alphabet, determined by the year of its birth, rather like the way British car registration plates used to be organised.

The alphabetised system began in 1926, with Z omitted. In 1972 the Commission Nationale d’Amélioration Génétique further regularised the system, and K, Q, W, X and Y were also taken out of contention. The advice is very detailed. You can, if you wish, give your pet another name for everyday use but most people seem to stick to just one. Friends of mine who make jam in Picardy, and always have at least two terriers about the place, name their dogs after fruit: last year’s crop of puppies included Fraise and Framboise; this year they’ll have to go for Groseille.

If you can’t think of a name, you can ask your vet for a list of fifty or so; online, of course, there are thousands to choose from. One of the suggestions this year is Gillian – such an unattractive name, and so singularly impossible to pronounce in any language other than English. Others include Guerlain, Givenchy, Gloop, Granola and Gen Gis Khan. But if you’d like to call your pet Kubla Khan, King Kong or Kevin you can always move to Belgium, where the Livre des origines Saint-Hubert features K as the chosen letter for 2011.

Comments on “Not just one of your holiday games”

  1. Martin says:

    This system presumably allows the owner of the moggy and the mongrel the luxury of choosing any name, but at the risk of their pet being looked down upon.

    – Look at her. She can’t be more than four, yet she’s called Pamela.

    – Oh, I say! How common. Quick, cross the road.

  2. Bob Beck says:

    Though even more opprobrium might attach to a mongrel trying to “pass” under an orthodox name.

    “Hark at him! An obvious half-caste — a product of kennel doors being left unlocked, no doubt — yet he’s trying to fool us with ‘Givenchy’! These arrivistes will never learn. My dear, new pedigree is bad enough, but new *faux* pedigree? Why, I never…” (etc., etc.).

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Rikkeh on The Prince and the Ladybird: Would as many people have bought or talked about a Ladybird Book on climate change had the Dolphin not been involved? Almost certainly not. Is there a...
    • Thomas Jones on Earthquakes, continued: A hotel was buried under an avalanche in Farindola, Abruzzo. According to one of the rescuers, who were able to reach the place only on skis, 'there a...
    • Josef C. on At the Gogol Centre: Certainly Kurt Schwitters (* 1887, Hannover, Germany; + 1948 in Kendal, Cumbria, England) and his 'Ursonate' belongs to this artistic league of the pl...
    • Phil on Cold War Ghosts: The conclusion may or may not be a ghost. A USA-Russia propaganda alliance sounds like a weak force, compared to actual trends, which are internal and...
    • Doetze on Cold War Ghosts: It is not the present-day leftists who admire Putin, but the xenophobic ultra-right wing nationalists. Le Pen and Wilders got financing from the Kreml...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement