« | Home | »

What happened on March 26?


Escalate, an anonymous ‘collective of writers and activists from around the University of London’, has just published a stimulating Marxist analysis of the TUC march against the cuts:

What happened on March 26? The official answer is clear: hundreds of thousands of ‘people from all walks of life’ marched for an ‘alternative’. Who in fact were they, and what are their interests? And what material recourse do they have against their managed impoverishment? Among all the cloddish asininities emblazoned in grim edible pinks across a million A6 flyers, not once does the TUC mention class. Its current agenda is one of banal inclusivity… ‘Unification’ will be useless so long as it involves the subordination of all political fractions to the ‘middle classes’. At bottom, the pre-eminence of middle-class ‘values’ is the pre-eminence of bourgeois property rights.

Comments on “What happened on March 26?”

  1. loxhore says:

    why does the prose here remind me of keston sutherland

  2. lostlit says:

    So…I think it’s pretty clear by now that if you want an order civil structure – that is, not a society in which people roam around and do whatever – then a class system naturally results. People are too self-interested and variously so to not fight for more than the other; and there will always be those who don’t struggle for as much and therefore don’t have it. We in America deny that there is a class system here; and, while there may not be much “class” in the higher classes here, there is a hierarchy of privilege and power no less. Until the day that all people are born with the interest to share themselves and our resources, and not hoard or obstruct then won’t we have an equal society! We all know that will happen no time soon. Do these Escalate kids really think their “Marxist” analysis is soooo insightful? Please.

  3. outofdate says:

    Imagine being these people. Just thinking about their socks is enough to break your heart. And the padded grey Oxfam anoraks they have to wear through the nine-month winter, and the grey sagging faces, and no skill, and no joy, and no wit, and no beauty to relieve the abject misery of the Seven Sisters Road, and the awful hair, and the damp flat, and the squealing ungainly child, with the snot and the diarrhoea, and the hangovers worse every day, and nothing to wake up to all their lives but their loathsome inescapable selves…. Yet they can no more stopper the flow of hopeless bullshit out of their mouths than a bird can cease to sing. Imagine.

  4. simonpawley says:

    Stimulating? It’s simply ludicrous. The fact is that most of UKUncut really are campaigning (‘only’) for an effective system of taxation (worth remembering that the inspiration came from articles in ‘Private Eye’, which is many things but never anti-capitalist). And that most students really are campaigning to preserve funding for university tuition and EMA.
    The clincher comes in section 7: “The protesters at Fortnum and Masons required heavy treatment because the economic damage done to that shop was greater than a smashed window (even if it took 100 people instead of one or two). The mass arrest shows that it is not the protest tactic of violence or non-violence that matters to capital, but the contours of economic damage.” This is nothing short of fantasy. Windows were being smashed, and arrests needed to be made. Those in Fortnum and Mason were easy to round up. Lazy journalists eagerly complied in equating their number with the window-smashers, which left their readers with the impression that the violent protesters were the ones who had been arrested (‘Scenes of violence… 200 arrests made’).
    It’s little wonder nobody is keen to put their name to this stuff…

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement