« | Home | »

Broken Promises

Tags: |

A telling juxtaposition of headlines on the BBC homepage (click on the image to see the full width):

For a reminder of the first executive order Obama signed after assuming office, see here.

Comments on “Broken Promises”

  1. Shantel Blakely says:

    The juxtaposition is indeed evocative, but according to the New York Times, acts of Congress since the closure of Guantanamo have made a civilian trial impossible.

  2. Shantel Blakely says:

    Sorry. I thought you meant to highlight the contrast between the announced signing of the executive order to close Guantanamo, and today’s announcement that trials for four of those accused for 9/11 will take place there–what an awful symbolic gesture! Is your point, instead, that he appears to have adopted a pragmatic attitude of running on his own broken promise? I think there is a distinction worth making, between changing one’s mind and meeting insurmountable resistance. The bigger problem, to my mind, is not the man but this “organization” in which the change has so far been obstructed.

  3. lostlit says:

    His cynicism is coming to the fore but no one mentions it. First it was his grand proposal to cut entitlements in the union address and then the omission of the proposed cuts in the actual budget leaving republicans to do the dirty work to blame them later during the election. Now this! This hypocrisy should have been ridiculed everywhere instead it’s glossed over in favor of his cynically timed announcement. Hopefully people see through his histrionics. I do. I have already committed my vote to the republican in 2012 because it won’t be Palin or Huckabee.

  4. Joe Morison says:

    Obama’s biggest problem is the relative powerlessness of the US president. We keep hearing that the holder of that office is the most powerful person in the world, and that’s because they are in commander in chief of the world’s most powerful army; and wherever they go, they are accompanied by the button which could blow us all up. But domestically, thanks to the separation of power which is one of the main aims of the US constitution, the president may simply be unable to do much that he promised.

    What i find most depressing about the forthcoming election is the talk that Obama may have a fighting fund of one billion dollars – that’s not democracy, it’s oligarchy.

  5. clareryan says:

    What Obama’s many retreats and reversals show is that he was embarrassingly naive or incompetent when he made the statements, in the first place… the American people, by a large majority, are against this sort of show trial for terrorists. It was the people, acting through their representatives in Congress and elsewhere who stopped this nonsense…

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement