« | Home | »

Resources for Homeschooling

Tags: | |

Everyone knows that Wikipedia is unreliable, though it’s not clear where the evidence for that knowledge comes from – maybe it’s on the internet somewhere – and a study in Nature a few years ago found that a random selection of science articles on Wikipedia sent out for peer review were nearly as accurate as the Encyclopaedia Britannica. But maybe that simply means that the Britannica isn’t as reliable as we used to think. So where to turn? Where else but Conservapedia, ‘the trustworthy encyclopedia’, started in 2006 by Andy Schlafly – according to Wikipedia, he’s a ‘lawyer, conservative political activist’ and ‘teacher of homeschooling classes’ – as a corrective to the ‘liberal bias’ of Wikipedia. Its list of ‘popular articles’ on the homepage include:

Greatest Conservative Songs (top of the list, ‘Wouldn’t It Be Nice’ by the Beach Boys, because it’s ‘pro-marriage’)

Jesus Christ (‘the person who changed the world forever with teachings of love and faith, using logical parables like the Prodigal Son that flow from the existence of God’)

The Tea Party Movement (‘an ongoing, nationwide mainstream movement of grassroots protesters, encompassing millions of individuals and thousands of self-organizing groups, all united in accomplishing a single goal: returning fiscal responsibility and limited government to the United States through the exercise of political activism’)

Barack Obama (‘President Obama is the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America’s nuclear weapons’)

Homeschooling (‘Homeschooled students make up many of the top college and graduate students in mathematics today’)

Homosexuality (‘Given the many diseases associated with homosexuality, the biblical prohibition against homosexuality is arguably one of the many examples where the Bible exhibited knowledge that was ahead of its time’)

Abortion (‘Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by dismemberment. Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, and other long-term health problems for the mother, as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion’)

Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (‘Wikipedia does not mention until after 600 words that Jared Loughner, like many Wikipedia editors, is an atheist’)

For some reason the good folks behind Conservapedia are nervous about being hijacked by ‘liberal’ hackers. A couple of years ago the site blamed such ‘political terrorists’ for posting a list of Democratic senators in states with Republican governors and the observation that

If these Senators were unable to complete their terms and were replaced by qualified Republicans by their Republican governors, the Republican Party would regain a commanding majority in the Senate.

The satirical blog Wonkette glossed this as ‘Conservative Wiki Offers Helpful List of Senate Democrats To Assassinate’, but surely only a godless liberal could interpret it that way, and besides the whole thing was a set-up by a liberal conspiracy ‘intent upon, dedicated to, mocking our conservative, Christian-friendly encyclopedia’.

These days, Conservapedia is more careful about who it lets in, not only to edit its pages but even to read them. I don’t know what’s so suspiciously liberal about my browsing behaviour – maybe I shouldn’t have called Conservapedia ‘hilarious yet terrifying’ on Twitter – but I keep being locked out of the site: the only way I can sneak back in is by disguising myself using Tor, but even that doesn’t always work. It seems I’ll just have to go back to homeschooling myself with Wikipedia.

Comments on “Resources for Homeschooling”

  1. Check out their Conservative Bible Project, a rewrite into right-wing American English. If the site won’t let you in this Metafilter thread will do. Sample sentence from one of the ‘translators': ‘Tentatively using “intellectuals” rather than “Pharisees”.’

  2. Samuel Lisi says:

    Wikipedia includes an interesting article discussing, among other things, the Nature review:

  3. lostlit says:

    Ah, another and future generation of American sociopaths on it’s way.

  4. RogerB says:

    See here for something about Conservapedia and blocking

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Stephen W. Smith:
    The French Intervention in Mali
    7 February 2013

    ‘Depending on what counts as military intervention, France changed the course of history by force in sub-Saharan Africa about thirty times between 1945 and 1990.’

    Bruce Whitehouse:
    What went wrong in Mali?
    30 August 2012

    ‘The Republic of Mali has long been seen as the exception to the dictatorships or civil wars that have seemed the rule in West Africa since the end of the Cold War.’

    Jeremy Harding: Algeria’s Camus
    4 December 2014

    ‘Camus liked to hector the settlers, whose behaviour reflected the structural injustices of colonialism. All the same, he felt that certain misconceptions in metropolitan France needed straightening out.’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement