« | Home | »

Better Cooking through Chemistry

Tags: | |

Nathan Myhrvold, who used to be Microsoft’s chief technology officer, has just published a £395, six-volume, 2400-page paean to the type of cooking sometimes known as ‘molecular gastronomy’. Modernist Cuisine is a luxurious and slightly self-congratulatory piece of work: a section of the accompanying website outlines every detail of the printing process (stochastic screening using Chroma Centric inks, if you’re interested); publication was delayed in order to redesign the slipcases, which had ‘failed a rigorous series of drop tests’. It’s full of amazing food-porn photographs of dishes being cooked, as well as essays on such topics as ‘Vaporisation and Condensation’ and ‘Sublimation and Deposition’.

Modernist Cuisine was written in response to that common problem, the lack of clear instructions for cooking ‘sous vide’. The technique involves vacuum-packing cuts of meat and immersing them in water at a carefully calibrated, relatively low temperature (around 60ºC) for a very long time. A burger takes 36 hours to cook and requires, as so many of these dishes seem to, liquid nitrogen. Centrifuges and rotor-stator homogenisers feature heavily.

The book brings to mind Marinetti’s Futurist Cookbook, which combined polemical attacks on pasta with demands for

the abolition of everyday mediocrity from the pleasures of the palate. We invite chemistry immediately to take on the task of providing the body with its necessary calories through equivalent nutrients provided free by the State, in powder pills, albumoid compounds, synthetic fats and vitamins.

Marinetti abolished knives and forks: you should eat with your left hand while stroking sandpaper and silk with your right. Between each course, aromas would ‘be driven from the table with the help of electric fans’. ‘Prescribed doses of poetry and music’ would ‘accentuate the flavours of a given dish with their sensual intensity’. ‘A battery of scientific instruments in the kitchen’ would be required to make ‘Sculpted Meat’, ‘Aerofood’ and ‘Chicken Virile’:

ozonisers to give liquids and foods the perfume of ozone, ultra-violet ray lamps (since many foods when irradiated with ultra-violet rays acquire active properties, become more assimilable, preventing rickets in young children etc.), electrolysers to decompose juices and extracts etc. in such a way as to obtain from a known product a new product with properties, colloidal mills to pulverise flours, dried fruits, drugs etc.: atmospheric and vacuum stills, centrifugal autoclaves, dialysers. The use of these appliances will have to be scientific, avoiding the typical error of cooking foods under steam pressure, which provokes the destruction of active substances (vitamins etc.) because of the high temperatures. Chemical indicators will take into account the acidity and alkalinity of the sauces and serve to correct possible errors: too little salt, too much vinegar, too much pepper or too much sugar.

Marinetti even opened a restaurant in Turin called the Taverna Santopalato (‘tavern of the holy palate’). His dishes never really took off, but he could hardly have expected them to: The Futurist Cookbook was a provocative joke. I wonder how seriously we should take Myhrvold et al?

Comments on “Better Cooking through Chemistry”

  1. Geoff Roberts says:

    “Microsoft’s “chief technology officer”? Does all this stuff himself does he when Bill and the gang drop in for a few hash browns and some frozen burgers? Or does he send out engraved DVDs which demonstrate him preparing the food (food?) and informing them that the burgers will be ready in November? I’ll give this piece to one of my classes of cooks and and let you know what they think of it. I think that it’s all simply a new way to invest your surplus cash. Buy one of these things and watch the price rise by 50% in two weeks. This is not a joke, Microsoft officers are not allowed to have a sense of humour.

  2. Martin says:

    Cooking like this would require liberal use of nitrous oxide rather than liquid nitrogen. Talk about sucking the marrow out of cooking and leaving a bit of gristle for you and your guests to chew on.
    ‘Hi, I’ve just put the oven on for dinner, so why don’t you guys pop round tomorrow evening at about 7.23? It should be ready then. But please don’t bring chilled drinks, open the freezer door or laugh too loudly when you arrive, as it may well disturb the equilibrium of the veal cutlets.”

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Neil Kitson on Unwinnable War Two: There is no Chapter VII support for military action in Resolution 2249.
    • pinkycubin on Unwinnable War Two: Streetsj, It is obvious there is no clear 'solution'. That doesn't therefore mean that the use of ordnance dropped from height is part of the answ...
    • soadenubi on Being Lord Lugard: As a Nigerian normally resident in Lagos, I found the blog:Being Lord Lugard a most interesting read. This note is primarily a request that the Autho...
    • streetsj on Unwinnable War Two: Yes. So what's your solution? A negotiated settlement of peace for everyone. And who would disagree - but realistically what is the answer? One thing...
    • streetsj on What does Osborne want?: I have thought since 2010 that much of the most austere rhetoric has been directed at the financial markets. Meanwhile reality is very different as pu...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement