« | Home | »

Marine, Marianne, Marion

Tags: | |

Last week Chantal Brunel, the right-wing UMP deputy for Seine-et-Marne, told the press that it was time to stick immigrants back in the boat. She was thinking of the large numbers, mostly Tunisian, who came ashore on the Italian island of Lampedusa in February. But her real worry was the fizzing popularity of the Front National – a champagne bubble bath lovingly filled by the pollsters for the party’s leader, Marine Le Pen, in which she’s continued to bask as the rest of the political class queue up for cold showers.

First behind the shower curtain, Brunel herself, stalked by a posse of Norman Bates lookalikes, all of them dressed as Mother. ‘Makes you want to throw up’ (national secretary of the Communist Party). ‘Overtly racist’ (founder of the New Anti-Capitalist Party). ‘Shameful’ (Socialist Party bigwig). No way ‘to struggle against extremism and immigration’ (head of the PS). And from Brunel’s own ranks: ‘Not our position’, ‘I’ve said that I disapprove’, ‘we disapprove’ etc. These noises are a refreshing change from the gurgle of xenophobia in the salle de bains.

Brunel’s remarks were triggered by a poll predicting that Le Pen would be ahead by two percentage points in the first round of a presidential election if it had taken place on Sunday, 13 March – it’s scheduled for 2012. Critics claimed that the figures would have come out differently if someone other than Martine Aubry (struggling against ‘extremism and immigration’) had been named as the PS presidential candidate.

Harris Interactive, who conducted the original poll, scurried back to the drawing board and tweaked the model. Swap socialist candidate Aubry for Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a likely contender, or for François Hollande, who should have run in 2007, and Le Pen still comes out on top. Two rounds of voting, two rounds of polling; turbulence ahead.

The internet journal Mediapart has denounced Harris Interactive for its lottery gimmick: respondents are invited to play every three months. (Opinionway, a rival online pollster, offers loyalty points for regular participants and a gift counter where they can be traded in.) Yet there’s no question that this month’s star prize from Harris went to Marine Le Pen, for creeping past the incumbent and the main opposition. Until, that is, it was wrenched from her hands when yet another poll, by Ifop, put her in third place behind both.

Never mind: she’ll be the candidate to watch, whether the centre right opts for the language of moderation or plays to her strengths by talking tough on immigration and ‘Islam’. Either way, we’re back at the Bates Motel as Marion’s blood – or is it Marianne’s? – pours down the plughole. But there’s encouraging news from yet another poll: Psycho features nowhere in Allociné viewers’ top 100 movies of all time. And the worrying news? At no. 1, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. The punters must decide.

There now follows an all-purpose party political broadcast for the French presidential elections 2012:

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement