« | Home | »

Qadhafi’s Left Arm

Tags: |

The US ambassador to Libya, Gene Cretz, may be the first senior diplomat to fall victim to the release of confidential embassy cables on WikiLeaks. ‘Ambassador (Gene A.) Cretz is in Washington for consultations… The question of when Ambassador Cretz returns to Libya will be one of the many subjects of his consultations,’ a spokesman said last week. Appointed in 2007, Cretz was the first US ambassador to Libya since 1972. Last month Colonel Qadhafi praised WikiLeaks for exposing US hypocrisy. ‘The true face of US diplomacy has been revealed through the confidential documents,’ he said. This ‘proved that America is not what it has led allies and friends to believe it to be’.

Most of the stories from Tripoli that were picked up in the western media were old news in Libya, where few are unaware, for example, that Qadhafi suffers from phobias about flying, travelling over water and staying on upper floors. Many elderly desert bedouin feel the same way and no one thinks that Qadhafi travelled 7000 miles around Africa by land because of his love for African unity.

One of the more curious – and less reported – stories concerns a businessman from Las Vegas who befriended one of Qadhafi’s bodyguards and ended up spending a fair amount of time with the Leader inside his tent. The ‘consultant’ remains anonymous, but the bodyguard is named as Mabruka al-Sharef. ‘Mabruka, who is in her mid-40’s, is known to be very close to Qadhafi,’ Cretz writes. ‘She has been described to emboffs’ – embassy officials – ‘as “Qadhafi’s left arm”.’ The consultant first met Mabruka in early 2009. By November of that year, when the cable was sent, she ‘had provided him access to Qadhafi on numerous occasions and even arranged for the two to meet during the Leader’s September visit to New York.’ On the other hand, ‘the consultant had not yet managed to secure business contracts for any of his clients.’ There may be a straightforward bureaucratic reason for this: at the moment, just one member of the Revolutionary Guard is signing off on all government tenders, so there’s quite a backlog.

Cretz’s supporters say that he was a popular ambassador but the word in Tripoli is that Libyans never much liked him. In the run-up to his departure Qadhafi reportedly suggested to the visiting US assistant secretary of state for economic, energy and business affairs, Jose Fernandez, that he might like to take Cretz home with him. The Libyans weren’t fed up with Cretz only because of the WikiLeaks cables: they have been feeling short-changed by the US since dismantling their WMD programme in 2003.

Comments on “Qadhafi’s Left Arm”

  1. Mike Killingworth says:

    Four years is a reasonable tour of duty for an ambassador, surely…

  2. outofdate says:

    No, that’s not good enough. The Koreans are doing lively business with Libya, and they’ve found time to fall out and make up again while that Cretz fellow’s basically been malingering.

  3. Geoff Roberts says:

    “a businessman from Las Vegas who befriended one of Qadhafi’s bodyguards and ended up spending a fair amount of time with the Leader inside his tent.” The mind boggles. I wonder what they talked about? Certainly doesn’t sound as if it was business that they chatted about. Maybe Qadhafi recounted his adventures with his old chum Berlusconi, while the busom friend tendered tea and Quat. I don’t suppose they discussed trade agreements.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement