« | Home | »

Brazil ♥ India

Tags: | |

Britain may have invented the soap opera but nowhere has the format been promoted more vigorously than in Latin America. For decades, telenovelas have been produced in Mexico, Venezuela, Argentina and elsewhere, and viewed by hundreds of millions daily from Mexico City to Buenos Aires. Their reach extends to the US and (on a more limited basis) to state-controlled TV in Cuba. Wherever you are in most of the Americas, you can keep up with developments in your favourite soap.

Most telenovelas deal with a rarefied upper class, which owns expansive town houses or idyllic haciendas with gauchos and impressive herds of cattle – more Dallas than Coronation Street. The characters jet between Caracas and Miami as if they were taking a taxi into town, though the action is almost entirely confined to interior shots. They live in luxurious houses with numerous sitting rooms, usually connected by short flights of stairs to facilitate dramatic entrances and exits, but no bathrooms or kitchens. Darker skinned Latin American ‘Indians’ usually appear only as servants or as secret lovers. The adverts, too, are populated exclusively by white people.

But one of the dramas currently gripping the continent violates practically all of the established norms. India: A Love Story, made in Brazil and originally broadcast over the first six months of last year (it won the 2009 International Emmy Award for Best Telenovela), still deals with a rarefied upper class, but features as many dark-skinned people as light-skinned. And it steers clear of any connection with Miami, dividing its action instead between Brazil and India.

A high-caste Hindu woman (in Latin America, all people from India are known as Hindues, regardless of their religion), working in a call centre, falls in love with a Dalit man. Her family forbid any further contact with her lover, she disobeys them, and things get complicated when they arrange a marriage to a much more suitable businessman. But his business has regular links with Brazil, where – of course – he has fallen in love with a glamorous Brazilian woman.

India as depicted in India: A Love Story has little bearing on reality (the poor masses barely figure, even in outside shots of markets) but this hardly matters, since neither does the telenovela’s version of Brazil. More important is that here we have a programme based on the links between two of the world’s biggest developing countries, which occupies an hour of primetime TV every weekday evening. Irrespective of the machinations of Chávez or Lula – or perhaps very distantly influenced by them – the Latino masses are learning about the new world order. Most of the shots may still be called by the Americans who live north of the Rio Grande, but they are a power in decline. In its recognition of this realignment, at least, the telenovela has its feet firmly on the ground.

Comments on “Brazil ♥ India”

  1. A.J.P. Crown says:

    I don’t think Britain invented the soap opera, why do you say that? The name comes from the soap advertising that took place on US productions.

  2. John Perry says:

    You may well be right. I bow to superior knowledge of TV history.

  3. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Well, I was expecting a more interesting answer than that. Couldn’t you have invented something?

  4. John Perry says:

    I think the contrast is interesting between what in Britain we probably regard as conventional ‘soaps’, the mainstay of British TV (at least until the advent of ‘reality’ television), and the Latino culture where soaps have an even bigger role in day-to-day life. But they are of a very different kind, as the article says. I don’t know the intentions of the makers of India: A love story, but consciously or unconsciously they have broken quite a big mould in making a soap about such an unfamiliar place. Added to this, they have (consciously or unconsciously) made a political point. And to top it all, the programme is – in Nicaragua at least – highly popular.

    Jason Kennedy, who also writes for the LRB blog, commented to me that in Guatemala the government actually set out to promote a soap – about and of course made in Guatemala. This was seen as potentially putting Guatemala on the map. Regrettably (perhaps), they haven’t yet succeeded in persuading anyone to do it. But it’s another acknowledgement of the cultural importance of the telenovela or soap.

    • A.J.P. Crown says:

      Jason could make a Guatemala ♥ Taiwan soap, possibly, since he’s there now.

      Is it about an unfamiliar place or the same place? I once saw some Brazilian soaps and, as you say, they were made only with studio video shots that could have been anywhere. Late 1960s Crossroads may have been the British precedent for these shallow, claustrophobic interiors, but I’m sure there are US soaps that predate even Crossroads. I’d say the key is that they are very similar, and very popular, worldwide — sort of like the Bible.

      • pinhut says:

        It’s weird, but I had a soap-style moment tonight. I went on a date with one woman, and because of that, was in the street at midnight and bumped into another woman, just leaving work. Our eyes met, etc. And we had our first ever conversation. Couldn’t believe my luck.

    • pinhut says:

      It wasn’t actually the government, it was a clique of the metropolitan elite. I think the idea was to create female competition to be a well-known actress, as a means of generating thousands of man hours on the casting couch.

  5. alex says:

    It seems quite straightforward to me. British soaps try for more ‘realism’ or to ‘reflect society’ according to some dated Leavis/Williams/Hoggart paradigm, but end up being patronizing and dull. Latin American soaps, wildly unrealistic though they seem to be, actually provide some things society needs – aspiration, something to tickle the imagination.
    And what they aspire to is changing. Doesn’t need to be a kind of ersatz Dallas anymore. ersatz Bollywood might be more enticing, as India and China become big economic players.

    • pinhut says:

      “wildly unrealistic though they seem to be”

      Hmmm… there are women exactly like these characters in Mexico (at least). Many Latin women simply *are* wildly unrealistic, compared to my UK roots. Particularly the clothes! If anything, the telenovela clobber is rather restrained!

      But, for the poor, definitely, a thousand times yay, I’m with you, these telenovelas satisfy not any genuine aspiration (other than to not be poor, I suppose, which is for many, an impossible dream), but they do lift people out of mundane jobs and the daily grind of poverty, etc. In my experience, they’re very popular with maids (at least in Guatemala).

      (I’m doing my damndest to avoid making anything that sounds like a generalisation, go easy on me).

  6. Harry Stopes says:

    A further difference between British soaps and Telenovelas is that while British soaps run essentially forever, Latin American telenovelas have storylines that come to an end after about 6 months. Which might be why telenovelas seem to be more versatile (and more interesting?) in what they produce.

  7. alex says:

    They are regularly broadcast in Eastern Europe (with subtitles), that’s where I got into them.

  8. John Perry says:

    The contrast with the gritty ‘realism’ of say East Enders is interesting in the Latin American context of countries massively divided between rich and poor. If you look at the GINI coefficients for each nation, there isn’t a single LA country which has a better score than the US,which itself has one of the world’s worse scores [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality].

    So here we have a genre (the telenovela) based on the lives of the super-rich, popular across a continent in which a tiny elite do indeed lead lives that otherwise would be unimaginable to those watching their TV sets in (often) overcrowded homes with earth floors and corrugated iron roofs. Do they imagine those governing them (and exploiting them) are accurately depicted, or do they just enjoy it as a fantasy? Perhaps I should investigate…

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement