« | Home | »

Product Placement

Tags: | |

Ever since the reports of October’s foiled ink-cartridge bombings mentioned that a book was in one of the boxes along with the printer, I’ve wondered what it was, and if it had some symbolic meaning. It was impossible to make out in news photographs, but the mystery is solved in the November issue of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula’s English-language magazine (via Christopher Hitchens in Slate), which published pictures of one of the bombs being made and a close-up of the book:

Is the cover torn off because of Islamist hard-liners’ objections to graven images? On the front of the Oxford World’s Classics edition in question there’s a portrait of a mournful-looking boy by the Liverpudlian painter Thomas Hargreaves. As for the book itself: ‘We were very optimistic about the outcome of this operation,’ the article says. ‘That is why we dropped into one of the boxes a novel titled, Great Expectations.’ It’s as unsophisticated as the magazine’s own name, Inspire. There may be a bit more to it, though: Anwar Awlaki, AQAP’s chief theoretician, read Dickens while he was in jail in Yemen; he liked Hard Times.

Inspire looks a bit like a British local authority’s magazine in the pre-austerity era. Much of its content, as Shiraz Maher of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence has pointed out, is aimed at ‘goading Western intelligence services’. The magazine boasts that the plot cost only $4200 (the Dickens a snip at £3.50) and was a success even though the bomb was detected, since the new airport security measures that have been introduced in response to it will cost the West ‘billions of dollars’, while doing nothing to prevent another attack. On this, at least, al-Qaida and Hitchens agree.

Comments on “Product Placement”

  1. tom mccarthy says:

    Hi Alex. There’s a rich history of this, or a history at least. The Baader-Meinhof gang used a hollowed-out copy of Moby-Dick to smuggle weapons into their comrades in prison. And, a little more abstractly, the British secret services in WW2 triggered explosions and assassinations in occupied France by reading lines of poetry over the radio (the Resistance members knew which lines were the trigger ones). It’s Burroughs’s fantasy: the word itself as a weapon. Books are dangerous, and should be.

  2. Imperialist says:

    My favourite bit is al-Awlaki’s rather middle-class reading of Dickens.”The amazing cruelness of Stephen Blackpool was similar to some people who appear on the surface to be decent and kind human beings; and Uriah Heep was similar to some pitiful Muslims today.”

    Has Slavoj Žižek already written about the counter-revolutionary character of jihad?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement