« | Home | »

Incredibly Gifted

Tags:

Judging by the number of hits on her YouTube clips, the 23-year-old Georgian pianist Khatia Buniatishvili can scarcely be called a discovery, but, when I chanced on her for the first time the other day on Radio 3, her playing came as a revelation to me. She was in the middle of the Schumann C major Fantasy, playing it as if it really meant something to her, and the sense of release in the flow of musical energy was wonderful, creating great emotional intensity without any distortion to the architecture of the piece.

Buniatishvili is incredibly gifted. She has temperament, sensibility and intelligence, and, like the very greatest pianists before her, she has the ability to make the listener hear in the sound of the music the experience of the fingers that are making it. In seeming ourselves to touch, we are touched.

She hasn’t made any recordings yet, so you’ll have to make do with the smattering of fragmentary YouTube clips. I’d start with the various bits and pieces of the Schumann Fantasy, then move to the two extracts from the Brahms Second Piano Concerto (the clip from the second movement is especially startling). There are also extracts from the Chopin B minor Scherzo and the fourth Ballade, snatches of the Liszt Sonata and a frankly incredible performance of the Mephisto Waltz which restores imagination to piano virtuosity and makes you understand what Liszt was all about.

Comments on “Incredibly Gifted”

  1. jpehs says:

    She is certainly gifted, but did the first LRB blog entry on her, of all places, have to make her into a pretty physical object of fantasy? I suspect Nicholas Spice would not be so breathless about the possibility of Alfred Brendel’s fingers running all over him. The cleavage-celebrating video itself doesn’t help much, admittedly.

    • Thomas Jones says:

      How could he know what she looked like when he was listening to her play on Radio 3?

    • Vance Maverick says:

      I don’t see what you’re referring to. The closest I can find is the ending of the second paragraph:

      …she has the ability to make the listener hear in the sound of the music the experience of the fingers that are making it. In seeming ourselves to touch, we are touched.

      which is certainly overwrought, but even if taken literally, doesn’t mean she’s touching us with her fingers.

    • A.J.P. Crown says:

      The cleavage-celebrating video itself doesn’t help much, admittedly.

      Your innuendos make it sound like the cleavage exposing was done by anyone other than Buniatishvili herself. You can’t blame Nicholas Spice that Youtube video is the only available medium for listening to free music. I found the entire video (facial expressions, cleavage) distracted my attention from what was being played so well.

      • outofdate says:

        You Englisch, alvays vith the puritanism, alvays vith the disapprove. What’s wrong with a good cleavage, one, and two I don’t mind seeing a nice pianist in action. Anyway in the Mephisto Waltz video, which really is very good, she looks as if her spine is inhabited by some nasty extraterrestrial, so she can’t be accused of being eye candy.

    • Geoff Roberts says:

      What do you look at on You Tube?

  2. Alfred Brendel – possibly not. Bill Evans, on the other hand…

  3. Geoff Roberts says:

    Superb interpretation. What’s all this stuff about cleavages got to do with the musical talent? Don’t get it.

  4. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Thanks very much for this, Nicholas Spice. Everything you’ve said is right, it is incredible playing, the Liszt is thrilling to hear.

  5. ‘Overwrought’? Not at all. Merely descriptive. Music works through metaphors of the body. It moves and breathes. And to play music well, you have to move and breathe in the right way. With singers and wind players, that’s obvious. With string players and conductors breath enters the music mediated by gesture – of the bow and the hand. The piano is a fascinating case, because it’s an entirely mechanical industrial percussion instrument (in many ways rather monstrous). To make music breathe on the piano, you need touch. Interestingly, in German the word for piano keys is ‘Tasten’, which is cognate with ‘touch’ and ‘taste’. Touch is perhaps an even more potent metaphor than breath. We speak of being touched when we are moved, when something affects us emotionally. Music touches us. Touch, like tenderness, looks both ways – it’s transitive and intransitive: we are tender towards people and tender (i.e. vulnerable); we touch and are touched. Quite how a pianist conveys breath through touch (touches us through touch) is something of a mystery, but when it works (I think of Mary-Lou Williams, Artur Balsam, Bill Evans) it is transformative and all the more affecting because of the apparently intractable inertness of the instrument.

    • Vance Maverick says:

      Sorry for the unfriendly term. My real point, as I hope was clear, was to acquit you of lingering on the performer’s person. (Classical-music stagecraft still makes it hard for female performers to avoid performing femininity — not your fault, nor Buniatishvili’s.) I like this version of the Schumann (my reference is Richter, and this differs instructively).

      I don’t really disagree with most of what you write above, but I’m doubtful of the ability of words to get to the heart of the phenomena you’re addressing.

    • Martin W says:

      In Spanish, too, to play an instrument is “tocar” – to touch or feel.

  6. cigar says:

    After reading or rather enduring Nicholas’ post, I chose to listen to the audio with the video out of sight, scrolling down after clicking play. I am not a big fan of Schumann, but I think there’s no doubt this is a very good interpretation. What stood out right at the beginning was her subtle, conscientious use of dynamics, and later of changes in tempo, which combined produced some beautiful phrasing. For now I think she deserves all the success that comes her way, and can only hope she does get it.

    But Nicholas’ post is a prototypical example of what is wrong with music criticism these days: it is so purplish, he might as well have used that color for the font. Perhaps also one of those ersatz longhand topographies and added an RSVP for Kathia. And his comment goes beyond, becoming purely embarrassing. “Music works through metaphors of the body. It moves and breathes.” This is the kind of writing that makes me turn the TNY or NYT into an spherical ballistic missile following a curvaceously voluptuous trajectory to the rubbish bin. Every single of Nicholas words’ brings attention to his kitschy sensibility rather than to the performance he is writing about, to the musician, let alone the music. He should be reviewing Liberace or his contemporary heir, Lang Lang and stay away from real talent like this pianist.

    • outofdate says:

      Crikey. There I thought ‘I’d start with the various bits and pieces of the Schumann fantasy’ was a fairly innocuous way of putting it, but I suppose once alerted to the Colour Purple you start seeing it everywhere.

    • outofdate says:

      Also, why is Lang Lang crap? Because he’s a noodling, gibbering, lazy showoff without respect for what he’s playing, slippery of touch, you might say, and thus unable to touch his, er, viewers. How do you make the point without resorting to metaphor and conjecture? I don’t know that he has no respect for music, perhaps in his stupid way he reveres it, yet I know as I live that he has no respect for music. And I think my metaphors are really rather apt, whereas your ‘conscientious use of dynamics and changes of tempo’ tells me precisely nothing, though it’s no doubt excellent copy for the new Hyundai Sonata.

  7. A.J.P. Crown says:

    There’s a short Radio 3 interview here, if anybody’s interested.

  8. Oliver Rivers says:

    And you can hear her playing the Franck piano quintet with Gidon Kremer et al here (Spotify link).

  9. Geoff Roberts says:

    I’m surprised to find that this blog provoked 22 replies, whereas Neve Gordon’s recent post on the US indecent offer to Israel earned two, which were both from me. Any views? It can’t have been the cleavage, or can it?

    • A.J.P. Crown says:

      If you look at the ten “Recent Posts”, listed above, I think this is the only one that isn’t about politics.

      • Oliver Rivers says:

        The news from Israel is awful; the news from various parts of Europe is not so great; the news from America is pretty depressing. Talking about piano playing’s something of a relief.

      • Thomas Jones says:

        But everything‘s about politics. Here’s Nicholas Spice in the LRB a few years ago:

        I have sometimes thought that the history of piano technique would make an amusing subject for Marxist analysis: the subjugation of the fingers in the finger-equalisation process, the turning of them into workers in a musical factory performing hour upon hour of mindless mechanical tasks in the interests of making money for someone, the anomie of the pianist, alienated from the music he is producing, no longer in control of the means of production as his body is turned into a machine and his mind put to sleep. Be that as it may, the problem with piano technique based on finger equalisation is that it encourages a thoughtless approach to music.

  10. jaspreetsinghboparai says:

    I wonder if anybody has any idea when a recording will be released?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


Advertisement Advertisement