« | Home | »

Still Singing

Tags: |

Walking from Trafalgar Square to the Houses of Parliament on Wednesday afternoon took about two hours and was very good fun. We were near an art-school crowd who were boisterously throwing glitter and confetti about, and had built an impressive ten-foot vulture out of bin bags and part of a hoover. The sun was out, London looked great, there was chanting (‘Tories, Tories will tear us apart again’ was a favourite), cheering and a brass band. The banners ranged from official university ones to the very much homemade (‘CUnTS’). Everyone was there because they were angry but it was like a celebration of us mobilising ourselves so all the way up to Millbank it felt like a kind of important party. On the embankment everyone congregated outside the Tory HQ where people had speakers, there was even dancing. When everyone noticed a crowd had made it up on to the roof we all cheered them, and they cheered back.

The window smashing started on about the fourth floor. I didn’t get the sense that people were for this or that it was the kind of gesture that had risen out of majority feeling. It definitely seemed the small group who had occupied the building were looking for a different kind of protest. Still, breaking glass didn’t provoke outrage, but when things started coming down from the roof it became very clear that this was not being supported by the crowd below. We all started booing, took up a new chant, ‘Stop throwing shit, stop throwing shit,’ and suddenly it felt like a pantomine, and that the guys on the roof were getting increasingly pissed off with the reaction from below – so more beer cans came down, and flag poles.

I left with friends because the mood had obviously changed but I didn’t get the feeling the violence was going to escalate. We returned to the site two hours later. More glass had been broken, there were a few people still inside refusing to leave, about a hundred or so out on the embankment and a lot more riot police. Looking at the damage you had that feeling of it being unreal, the shock factor that I suppose comes after the actual event, and in the dark with all the journalists’ vans about it felt like we were watching it on TV, much more sensational than it had actually felt being there two hours ago.

We needed to get through the crowd to head north to the tube so we checked with one of the police officers now stationed on the road if we could get through the crowd and exit on the other side. He said we could. We went through and were told by one of the officers on the other side that we couldn’t pass.

When we came back we weren’t allowed to leave the way we’d come in. We’d been misled and were being kettled. This is what these people were doing here, not hanging around to start trouble. Most people seemed calm but uneasy. There were some still singing. We weren’t being told how long it was likely to last and I felt quite panicked. It seemed a totally different day from the early afternoon and not at all where it had been headed.

It was extremely frustrating because I am sure that none of this group had anything to do with the violence though that was the justification for us being detained. It felt more like the police were making a show of being in control late in the day.

After about 45 minutes they started letting us out one by one, girls first, so I was out after an hour, but had to wait for friends for almost another two. They searched us, took our details and our photographs. On the stop and search document under ‘search grounds’ it just says: ‘Authorised by Chief Inspector McKenzie’. Presumably I could have refused to give my details or be photographed but this would have seriously delayed things, and all I wanted was to be in control of my space again – go to the loo, get some crisps.

Comments on “Still Singing”

  1. outofdate says:

    I’ve long felt that what CSI Friday or whatever it’s called doesn’t give you enough of is the arse-paralysing tedium of any brush with the law. Enough to put anyone off, or conversely, as Dickens says: suffer any wrong that can be done to you, rather than come here.

  2. Phil says:

    Fair point, but it’s worth keeping in mind that kettling is a distinctive, legally dubious and historically very new tactic, which has been designed specifically to inflict hours’ worth of tedious immobility (as well as asserting the police’s right to control public space).

    • Geoff Roberts says:

      It’s not that new – Berlin police used it in 1967, when the Shah of Persia was on a trip there. It’s since been used a lot whenever there have been some large demonstrations – has the big advantage to the police and the politicians of giving the photographers a shot of a large number of demonstrators under police control, which is what your average Spiesser wants to see.

      • outofdate says:

        Right, governments must be seen, and seen to be doing something, that is their sole concern. Having handed over most of their traditional powers to corporations, the only area where they can do that is in policing, i.e. eroding civil liberties and harrassing the public, because otherwise the public won’t look at the government, and then you might as well not have one at all.

  3. A.J.P. Crown says:

    I have the right to demonstrate, and the police don’t have the right to discourage me from doing so.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement