« | Home | »

Foundation X

Tags: |

It’s hard to know what to make of Lord James of Blackheath’s bizarre speech in the House of Lords on Monday night, in which he said that he’d been approached by an anonymous and unfeasibly wealthy international organisation, Foundation X, which was offering billions of pounds to the British state to help it through the financial crisis. Mention of the Vatican’s gold reserves and laundering money for the IRA under the approving eye of the Bank of England didn’t make his story sound any more plausible. It’s been suggested that he’s either ‘barmy’ or the victim of a particularly audacious hoax. The situation he describes has been compared to the plot of a novel by Robert Ludlum, Dan Browne or John le Carré. But as with many conspiracy theories (or at least the interesting ones), beneath the curlicues and false arches there’s a foundation of hard, rather prosaic fact. It’s no secret that in the 1980s and 1990s, the government sold off a fair whack of the nation’s assets to private and/or international buyers. Foundation X may not exist, but Tata Steel, Stagecoach and EDF most certainly do. Not that they’ve been much help to the British state, but then you can hardly expect a Tory peer to acknowledge that.

Comments on “Foundation X”

  1. Most consider scam-group “the Office of International Treasury Control” to be responsible due to their similar recent offer of £50 billion to the Scottish government.

    They tried a similar thing in Fiji, and got much further with the con than one old lord.

  2. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Lord James of Blackheath and not Baroness James of Holland Park?

  3. Geoff Roberts says:

    This was actually a genuine attempt by an honoured member of the Upper House to help out some old mates who have discovered billions of shrink-wrapped $100 bills that were distributed to worthy causes in Irak and now need a new home. The sums of money mentioned in your esteemed organ were itemised in a series of reports in 2004-5 by Ed Harriman, under the title of “where has all the money gone.” Ed Harriman: On the Take in Iraq [7 July 2005 and an article the year before. So now you know.

  4. pinhut says:

    “and laundering money for the IRA under the approving eye of the Bank of England didn’t make his story sound any more plausible.”

    I thought this made it sound more plausible. What better institution to have onside? He has a history of rescuing failing enterprises who perhaps had little choice about where fresh injections of capital might come from.

    Foundation X may be hooey, but that would not make me discount out of hand some of his other disclosures.

  5. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Yesterday’s Guardian: America’s central bank announced that it would pump an additional $600bn (£372bn) into the ailing US economy over the next eight months in an attempt to accelerate growth and cut unemployment.

    Apparently some people were expecting a trillion dollars, a million-million ($ 1,000,000,000,000), or $ 3,333 per citizen (citizen, not “taxpayer”). Do they always have this kind of money lying around or are they simply printing more?

  6. A.J.P. Crown says:

    …and I really enjoyed reading your Pynchon review, Call It Capitalism, that you link to. I’d somehow missed reading it the first time around. James Wood’s letter at the end reminds me of Stefan Collini’s recent remark about Trevor-Roper, But when you have AL Rowse, of all people, asking, “Why are you so nasty to people?”, you should realise all is not well with your character.

  7. Imperialist says:

    Was he approached by email? Will the money come from the estate of the former king of Zaire? Must the government first send £100 to a bank account in Lagos?

  8. ckeys says:

    I’m just trying to wrap my mind around the idea that there is actually someone named “Lord Eatwell”

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement