« | Home | »

The Longest Journey

Tags: | | |

It takes about a year to publish a book now, what with the festivals, the hairdos, the film producers and the jetlag. At the Jaipur Literary Festival earlier this year, I was happy to see the Indian schoolchildren out in force, ready – as nowhere else – with their autograph books and stubby pencils, keen to capture a signature just in case the author turned out to be famous. The children of Jaipur seem to imagine that anyone placed before a microphone is a possible celebrity. But, more than that, they have watched the talent shows over the last few years, and they know the difference between a common clerk and a monster celebrity is merely a matter of time and a little exposure to the public vote. It was nice, though, to see how open they were to the notion that writers stood a chance, as opposed to the average Joe mangling a Whitney Houston song.

In the journey last week from Vancouver to Toronto, I noticed that the morning TV shows have happily joined the game. They like having writers on, especially if the writer is willing to cast light on every kind of moral torpor except his own. On the Fanny Kiefer show, I pretended to drink coffee from a mug while decrying the loss of innocence at the cinema. ‘Terrific talking to you,’ Fanny said, before a producer ran up to tell me she knew somebody who once sat on Marilyn Monroe’s lap.

People like having books, or the notion of books, in their life, but by the time I got to Toronto I noticed a hurricane was brewing about just the opposite: about the moment when extremists decide that a book should be put out of commission. A regular question writers get asked in interviews nowadays is what they think of e-books. I say I like them – to say anything else is to sound like a silent movie star bemoaning the arrival of sound – but I don’t like to miss an obvious chance for a joke, so I make the point that e-books have one distinct disadvantage over printed matter. I say I come from a country, Scotland, with a lively history of burning books, and my people came from Ireland, a country which, within living memory, took a box of matches to books by Edna O’Brien and John McGahern. As well as that, Germany is not too far and Iran is never off the telly. The thing about e-books is, they’re a lot harder to set fire to.

In Toronto, my joke took on a darker hue – the darkest – with the news that Rohinton Mistry’s novel Such a Long Journey had just been banned by the new vice-chancellor of the University of Mumbai. The student wing of a far right organisation called Shiv Sena had burned copies of the novel at the university gates. Why? Because there’s a line in the book that isn’t very nice about Shiv Sena. It is traditional in such cases for the protestors not to have read the book, and this was no exception. The mob leader said it was a good thing the author lived in Canada, or ‘we would burn him as well.’ Nice. Mistry’s book, which has been part of the syllabus since its publication 20 years ago, was summarily banned.

This week, the Writers’ Union of Canada (along with the PEN All-India Centre and Mistry’s Canadian publisher, McClelland and Stewart) joined forces to condemn the ban as an affront not only to free speech but to the basic standards of decency underpinning the university. According to PEN:

India has lapsed into the worst kind of competitive populism, with political forces seeking to outdo one another in destroying and banning works of literature, art, theatre and cinema, in the name of an aggrieved religious, ethnic or religious sensibility. Not only does this constitute a betrayal of the liberal Enlightenment ideology that ushered India into postcolonial freedom, but it also makes nonsense of our claim to being a 21st century society.

In Canada, it looked as if an entire country, an entire community, as well as every writer I met, was ready to defend Mistry. Canada had seen such fights before: Deborah Ellis’s children’s book Three Wishes was pulled from school library shelves by the Toronto District School Board following an objection from the Canadian Jewish Congress, who felt the author’s interviews with Palestinian children constituted some sort of offence.

Mistry responds as a writer might well do, by suggesting the extremists read a few books, cover to cover. ‘Conrad’s Heart of Darkness,’ he says, ‘in order to consider the options: Step back from the abyss, or go over the edge.’ And while they’re about it, he adds, they might read through Tagore’s Gitanjali:

Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high;
Where knowledge is free;
Where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls;
…Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake.

Comments on “The Longest Journey”

  1. Joe Morison says:

    What is it about we Joes that makes us such prime candidates for averageness?

  2. Geoff Roberts says:

    Fanny Kiefer? She must be a reader of the Journal Of Endodontics. There is a touch of ennui in the text, I feel – the hullabaloo surrounding a book publication is probably quite energising for the first three or four books – ushered into stretch limousines, high-end finger food, eager young producer-assistants guiding the writer into and out of camera range.
    A friend once persuaded me to do some interviews at the Frankfurt Book Fair. I wandered about the halls, a camera/sound duo behind me, looking for English-speaking authors who would say something significant about the human condition. My problem was, I didn’t know what the producer wanted me to do, so the interviews were a little haphazard. The writers were very quick to comb their hair and hold their books up at the camera. Book presentations are another of those phenomena that go round in ever-decreasing circles.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement