« | Home | »

Looking for Love

Tags: | | |

The Lebanese braced themselves – some in excitement, others in dread – when Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit was announced. Since the early 1980s, when the Iranian Revolutionary Guard helped to set up Hizbullah, the Islamic resistance movement in Lebanon has been ‘the lung through which Iran breathes’ in the Arab world, as the late Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, an early mentor to Hizbullah, famously put it. That lung has developed into a mini-regional power – the only Arab army to have forced Israel to withdraw from Arab land, as Hizbullah often brags – and a major player in Lebanon’s highly sectarian, highly volatile political system, adored by its Shia followers and resented by many Sunnis and Christians.

It was only natural for Ahmadinejad to come to Lebanon to sing the praises of the Resistance, as Hizbullah is known in the region. Like any man who’s deeply unpopular at home, he was looking for love, and he could count on the traditional Shia greeting of rice and flowers, as well as a hero’s welcome from the Hizbullah leader, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah. Anything less would have been discourteous, considering the hundreds of millions of dollars – not to mention the seminary training, and the tens of thousands of rockets – that Tehran has given to Hizbullah.

The prospect of a love-in between Ahmadinejad and tens of thousands of Hizbullah supporters on Israel’s border was not a welcome one in Western capitals. With its usual respect for Lebanese sovereignty, the US urged the Lebanese government to deny him entry, hinting that it might be forced to cut aid to the Lebanese army. Israel wasn’t pleased, either, though some right-wing Israeli politicians noted that the Iranian president would be an easy hit for the IDF in southern Lebanon. ‘To assassinate Ahmadinejad today is like assassinating Hitler in 1939,’ said Aryeh Eldad, a MP in the National Union party. ‘He must not return home alive.’

Iran’s extremist Sunni opponents in al-Qaida made similar threats, promising that Lebanon would ‘tremble’ if Ahmadinejad set foot there. False alarms, as it turned out: the visit passed without incident. Ahmadinejad didn’t even throw a stone at Israel from the border, confining himself to his typical slogans about the imminent disappearance of the Zionist enemy. He doesn’t seem to have faced any tough questions about the state of Iranian politics, either, partly thanks to the Lebanese government, which successfully pressed the organisers of the Beirut International Film Festival to cancel a planned screening of Green Days, a documentary about protest and repression during the 2009 electoral crisis.

The Iranian opposition, however, was less keen to spare Ahmadinejad’s feelings. A group of prominent Iranian intellectuals published an appeal to the Lebanese people, and Nasrallah received a fiercely critical open letter from a prominent Iranian reformist, Mohammad Reza Khatami. Khatami, the leader of the Islamic Iran Participation Front, is known for his liberal views, but he is also very well connected: the younger brother of the former president, the former deputy speaker of parliament, and the husband of Khomeini’s granddaughter. The letter, published on his party’s website, began by reminding Nasrallah that ‘you and all knowledgeable people are aware of [Ahmadinejad’s] standing in the eyes of the people of Iran.’

Hundreds of the ‘true’ followers of Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution, Khatami continued, face the ‘most severe kind of pressure’ and the ‘worst conditions in prison’. Only a few days ago, he said, another reformist leader, Ali Shakouri Rad, a supporter of Hizbullah, was arrested after calling for the resignation of Gholamhossein Mohseni Eje’i, Iran’s prosecutor general; as the minister of intelligence during the 2009 presidential election crisis, Eje’i had presided over a wave of arrests. ‘In our opinion,’ Khatami said, ‘one cannot claim resistance against the Zionist regime and at the same time refuse to denounce the injustice against these true fighters, or, even worse, to approve of these actions.’

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement