« | Home | »

I Write like Dan Brown

Tags: |

I write like
Dan Brown

I Write Like by Mémoires, Mac journal software. Analyze your writing!

‘Check what famous writer you write like with this statistical analysis tool, which analyses your word choice and writing style and compares them to those of the famous writers.’ This is the – somewhat questionable, writing-wise – promise of I write like…, a handy website that invites casual browsers to paste in ‘your latest blog post, journal entry, Reddit comment, chapter of your unfinished book, etc’, and then uses its robot brain to break down the material. I went for blog posts, and can reveal that my first one on this site was written in the style of Nabokov; there followed an unsettling baroque phase – four posts – in which I wrote like H.P. Lovecraft, but since then I appear to have reined myself in, writing like Chuck Palahniuk and, most recently, Dan Brown. (The preceding sentences, however, are Nabokovian.) Further analysis from Metafilter’s qxntpqbbbqxl reveals that Nabokov writes like Dickens, Emily Dickinson like Lovecraft, Lovecraft like H.G. Wells, Dan Brown and himself; the King James Bible is like Shakespeare, who writes like James Fenimore Cooper. Kurt Vonnegut, Edgar Allan Poe and Isaac Asimov write like themselves.

Comments on “I Write like Dan Brown”

  1. Imperialist says:

    I’m David Foster Wallace, consistently. Which accurately discerns a dependence on parenthesis, a compulsion to include every implication and dialectical contingency, an addiction to an irony I don’t trust and a paradoxical awareness of the urgency and pointlessness of everything I say. Beyond that, the description is mere flattery. (Although the preceding lines are apparently like Vonnegut [which somehow seems to reinforce its the Foster Wallacianess .]) (However, an authentically DFWallacian text would be transformed into the David Foster Wallace-like prose it was always going to be by the preceding parenthetical appendix, whereas it apparently retained its Vonnegut characteristics.) (The difference between me and DFW is that he wouldn’t stop there. Or here. There also would follow a query about whether or not the application only looked at the opening sentences and whether or not that was sufficient justification to stop [or even a metaphysical incentive to keep going].) (Although once DFW became ‘David Foster Wallace’ he would keep going until he was ‘Kurt Vonnegut’ which would as yet be unnecessary because this remains in the style of Kurt Vonnegut, or at least the ‘Kurt Vonnegut’ of this application who has attained an identity separate from the World Famous Author Kurt Vonnegut (complicated by the fact that in this case ‘Kurt Vonnegut’ and Kurt Vonnegut actually write identically).)

  2. loxhore says:

    I got Nabokov. Yes!

  3. Jim says:

    hmm… apparently a lengthy extract from my dissertation on Heidegger, Althusser and the falsity of diachronic interpellation was written in the style of Enid Blyton.

  4. Imperialist says:

    Anthony Lane’s review of the Da Vinci Code was evidently written in the style of Dan Brown.


  5. Martin says:

    Well, I pasted in extracts from an article by two authors on environmental law and religion, which the ‘statistical analysis tool’ informed me were written like Lovecraft, Le Guin, Lovecraft, Le Guin, Lovecraft … Just when I was becoming comfortable with the idea, however, that the article clearly was the work of two authors who had simply taken turns to churn out a few paragaphs, up popped Margaret Atwood and then Chuck Palahniuk! So, a bit of plagiarism too. My own writing? Indistinguishable from JK Rowling’s. Sob!

  6. Phil says:

    We all write like Dan Brown (although I also write like Margaret Atwood, Douglas Adams, Stephen King, H.P. Lovecraft and William Shakespeare, no less). My personal theory is that it’s a kind of Zen art project whose punchline is the url: http://iwl.me/.

    I Write Like… Me, dammit! Me! I write like me!

  7. coolraoul says:

    I write like Dan Brown is the new “I am Spartacus”.

    My order confirmation from Amazon.co.uk “writes like James Joyce”.

  8. coolraoul says:

    Louis Menand in his takedown of Eat Shit and Leak also “writes like James Joyce”.

    2 Live Crew on the other hand, in “Pop that Pussy” (“Good, damn, shit, Look at the ass on that bitch, Look at the titties”) also “writes like Dan Brown”. It’s hard to imagine what the rest of their discography writes like.

    I’m guessing:

    “The Fuck Shop” — Thomas Mann

    “Check It Out, Y’all” (Freestyle) — Chretien de Troyes

    “Sex…Sex”, “Hell, Yeah” and “Chesterfield Island” – David Hume

  9. semitone says:

    “This is the – somewhat questionable, writing-wise – promise” … I just hope that “writing-wise” is ironic, because that kind of dreck gives me the shivers. What’s next, Chris: “who should I write like in the future, going forward”?

  10. outofdate says:

    Just because there are a few early glitches in the program, which I am grateful to the author for pointing out, albeit in a humorous vein, haha, hoho, laughter is the best medicine, the underlying algorithm is FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND, as will become clear in a few months when these teething troubles have, to use an Orwellian metaphor, been ironed out, or my reading list has expanded beyond the syllabus for English as a minor subject at my second-tier American university, whichever is the sooner, nor is there any reason at all to give up on socialism just because no functioning application has ever been observed or because, as some naysayers insist on claiming, doing the same thing over and over again, each time expecting a different resuklt, is a definition…

    Where was I? Yes, in a few months’ time I’ll be rich and you’ll be laughing on the other side of your face.

  11. RBBernstein says:

    I tried it repeatedly with paragraphs from the same essay, and the program told me that sometimes I write like Kurt Vonnegut, and sometimes like H. P. Lovecraft, and sometimes like David Foster Wallace, and on and on. Only sometimes did I get a repeat characterization, and that was either Vonnegut or Lovecraft. As I write American constitutional and intellectual history focusing on the founding period, I don’t know how my writing has anything in common with either Vonnegut or Lovecraft. Maybe David Foster Wallace; after all, we did attend Amherst College, only several years apart. I’m going to try this thing again, and we’ll see whose writing mine resembles this time.

  12. coolraoul says:

    David Foster Wallace writes like Kierkegaard in a Spiderman suit.

  13. Harry Stopes says:

    I started my MA dissertation writing like H.P. Lovecraft but concluded in the manner of Wilde.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement