« | Home | »

Resource Curse

Tags: |

Ghana, only the third African team ever to reach the quarter-finals of a World Cup, were unlucky to lose to Uruguay last Friday. Beyond football, however, a bigger question looms: will oil-rich Ghana, perceived as West Africa’s poster child of political stability, be the first African country to kick the ‘resource curse’?

In June 2007, a consortium of oil companies including the UK-based Tullow Oil and the US-based Kosmos Energy discovered recoverable reserves, currently estimated at 800 million barrels in Ghanaian waters, with the potential for a further billion barrels. Last year, Ghana spent $1.3 billion importing oil. The Jubilee oil field, one of Africa’s biggest offshore finds in the last decade, could turn Ghana into the continent’s fifth largest oil-producing nation, and should bring in $800 million a year. Production is scheduled to begin within the next six months. The first 200 billion cubic feet of gas have been promised free of charge to the state-owned Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC). But it’s uncertain how much the oil bonanza will benefit the Ghanaian government and the GNPC, let alone the Ghanaian people.

The Kwame Nkrumah MV 21, the Floating Production Storage and Offloading facility that will be used to exploit Ghana’s offshore oil during the first phase of development, is owned by Jubilee Ghana MV 21 BV, a special purpose company incorporated in the Netherlands. The Netherlands is host to more than 20,000 ‘mailbox companies’ (of which 43 per cent have a ‘parent’ in secrecy jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, the Netherlands Antilles or Cyprus). It specialises as a ‘passthrough’ conduit for financial flows including ‘dividends, royalties and interest payments’ via ‘special financial institutions’. The Dutch Central Bank defines ring-fenced SFIs as ‘subsidiaries of foreign parent companies used to channel capital through our country, which has little influence on the Dutch economy.’ The Netherlands does not place details of trusts on public record, or require that company accounts or beneficial ownership be made available for public record.

Corporate mispricing accounts for an estimated 60 per cent of illicit capital flight from resource-rich developing nations, especially those in oil and-mineral rich West Africa. In June 2005, the government of Ghana signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Barclays Bank, and since then Accra has grown as a centre of offshore banking. According to Barclays website:

The Barclays Offshore Banking Unit, the first of its kind in Ghana and indeed Africa south of the Sahara continues to offer world class banking service to non-resident private clients and corporates.

The Bank of Ghana said in a report that the International Financial Services Centre ‘should operate with a minimum of regulation’ even though ‘the operation of IFSC has implications for the Central bank’s work on good governance because it can reduce transparency, including through the exploitation of complex ownership structures.’

Combine that with a sudden influx of oil wealth – what could possibly go wrong?

Comments on “Resource Curse”

  1. mhughes says:

    Dear Khadija-

    I actually was going to ask a bit off-topic question about France’s exploitation of Niger’s resources and that is part of the reason millions will starve as the food crisis hits West Africa. I write for The Huffington Post as well and actually wanted to quote you on this topic. Feel free to email me anytime – mhughes3500@gmail.com. My name is Michael Hughes my huffpost page is http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-hughes and I actually did an article about France/Niger a bit ago at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-hughes/france-more-worried-about_b_470217.html

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement