« | Home | »

Deep Cover

Tags: | | | |

The story of Russia’s deep cover suburban spies in America is the perfect pitch for a 13-part TV series. It’s The Wire (illegals v. law enforcers), The Sopranos (aspirational lifestyles and typical middle-class problems among people living dangerous secret lives) and V (aliens among us) rolled into one. Lost? They do seem to have been.

Like Nigerian email fraudsters, whose sensational Moll Flanders-like tales of inheritances and warped morality suggest their talented authors would make more money bashing out African soap opera scripts than they ever would ripping off naive northerners, the easiest way for the Russian taxpayer to get back the money wasted on this loony espionage venture would be to deport the spymasters responsible to Los Angeles with a contract for a 50 per cent cut of whatever the going Screenwriters Guild rate is these days.

You’re struck less by the quaint technical details of spycraft (so one of them had a fake British passport – who doesn’t these days?) than by the diversity of their deep coverness. Not for these adventurers the easy fallback of anonymity and greyness. It was a stroke of brilliance for Vicky Peláez and Juan Jose Lázaro to conceal their alleged loyalty to the Kremlin beneath a veil of outspoken left-wing views. Who would have guessed, as they championed those notorious Washington-baiters Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez, that Vladimir Putin was their true idol?

Usually the world of narrative art and the world of practical government policy produce very different outcomes. Novels can’t drop bombs on people and bureaucrats don’t issue love stories. Life doesn’t often remind us how close the origins of fictional narratives are to the plans of civil servants: in the seed of ‘what if?’

Yet if you look back at Russia’s post-Soviet history, it is scattered with moments like this – episodes which seem superficially like acts of rational goverment, but whose actual impact is restricted to the resonance they create in the minds of spectators with other, weightier events. They are not exactly government acts, but narrative semblances of things other governments once did, or that the government who sanctions them would like its people to think it might dare to do for real one day, or that bored, daydreaming bureaucrats imagine is the kind of thing they are supposed to be doing.

When the Russian air force sent one of its nuclear bombers close to the British coast a couple of years ago, evading and hence embarrassing the Royal Air Force, it wasn’t because Russia wanted to attack Britain. When in 1999 a handful of Russian troops obstructed Nato’s efforts to take over Kosovo by squatting at Pristina airport, it wasn’t with the intention or ability to start a third world war. Rather it was the enactment of the idea of starting a third world war – a kind of performance art.

I fully expect to be watching that HBO series, Deep Cover, in a couple of years time. And perhaps the SVR officials soon to be wrestling with the problems of story arcs and snappy dialogue were influenced by the great Soviet TV series of their childhoods, Seventeen Moments of Spring, about a Russian spy in Nazi uniform at the heart of Hitlerite Germany. I fear that artistically, they will never surpass the performance work of their actual agents.

Comments on “Deep Cover”

  1. A.J.P. Crown says:

    The Guardian’s got a similar article.

  2. pinhut says:

    More deep cover, only this the Met turned against its own citizenry, infiltrating and crushing movements that pose any sort of challenge to the state.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/14/undercover-policeman-infiltrated-violent-activists

  3. Joe Morison says:

    When I was a boy, the US / USSR conflict filled me with eschatological fear. It’s rather lovely that it should have come to this.

  4. A.J.P. Crown says:

    The oddest part so far is that these people let their boss choose future parents for their children. Does that sort of thing go on in the Met too?

  5. Bob Beck says:

    As I recall it, even in Cold War days, and regardless of which Bloc dreamed them up, such episodes didn’t really resemble acts of rational government, not even superficially.

    “Not for these adventurers the easy fallback of anonymity and greyness.”

    I’m not so sure about that — according to another BBC page (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10459664.stm), Christopher Metsos is a Canadian citizen, while Tracy Lee Ann Foley, the one with the fake British passport, “purported to be Canadian.”

    But then, this doubles back to your Hollywood suggestion — these days, Hollywood in general, and the Screenwriters Guild in particular, is full of Canadians under shallow cover. Sleepers, awake!

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement