« | Home | »

Bear Shooting

Tags: |

We have a new prime minister, heading up a centre-right coalition, with a fondness for bear-shooting and cerise tops. It’s Mari Kiviniemi, elected on Tuesday by the Eduskunta, the Finnish Parliament, as leader of the governing coalition’s dominant Centre Party by a margin of 115-56. She takes over from the discredited Matti Vanhanen. Though the talk is that Vanhanen’s hand was forced by irregularities in party funding, he has blamed his departure on his leg (phlebitis). Vanhanen, like his successor, was chosen partly for his boringness: in a past life he was, incredibly, a teetotal journalist. He hadn’t even been through detox. But he then spoiled it all with a slather of extra-marital affairs.

Most of the time Finland is the Republic of Mogadonia. But the icebound stillness is tempered by the odd flare-up of public nudity or spree killing and – as Juhannus, this week’s midsummer blotto-fest, will again show – crapulence on an epic scale. A lot of Finns have birthdays late in March. On the other hand, it’s a bonanza for the grim reaper, too: a popular pastime is gambling on how many bladdered Finns will meet their deaths during Juhannus, usually at the bottom of a lake. The Helsingin Sanomat has stern warnings about diving off jetties into 10cm of water, and about urinating out of boats (‘ecologically irresponsible’). Last year Russian bootleggers were convicted of pumping moonshine over the border into Finland with a pipeline made of plastic biros.

As in the UK, sobering times lie ahead. In office Kiviniemi will be in partnership with the right-wing National Coalition Party, whose leader Jyrki Katainen continues to fill the Nick Clegg role of sub-prime minister. The new PM will seek to tame Finland’s budget deficit while reactivating its sluggish economy and cutting unemployment. Her administration has ten months till next year’s general election. She will be Finland’s second woman PM; the first, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, appointed in 2003, survived just two months before being forced out. In that year’s election campaign, Jäätteenmäki had alleged that the incumbent, Paavo Lipponen, had held secret talks with George W. Bush – the word being that Lipponen had pledged Helsinki’s backing for the Iraq invasion as a kickback for the US purchase of AMOS self-propelled mortar systems manufactured by the Finno-Swedish arms firm Patria-Hägglunds. It seems that Jäätteenmäki was stitched up by Martti Manninen, the Foreign Ministry mole who passed her the documents; although, like Jäätteenmäki, Manninen belonged to the Centre Party, he backed a rival, more pro-US faction. She quit when Manninen contradicted her story to Parliament that she had not, in breach of Finland’s official secrecy laws, solicited the documents. Jäätteenmäki was acquitted on all charges when the case came to court.

Non-alignment is a touchy matter in Finland. Jäätteenmäki’s real crime was against Finnish political etiquette, which is doggedly non-partisan in foreign affairs, at least on the hustings. Unlike former Warsaw Pact and indeed ex-Soviet republics like Poland, Hungary and the Baltic states, Finland remains outside Nato. Maybe the very lack of formal dominance by the USSR in the era of ‘finlandisation’ has made it harder, for Finland to flirt with Atlanticism than for its Baltic neighbours since the Cold War ended. Above all, the Finns don’t want to cross the Russians, now as in tsarist times their biggest single trading partner. On election as Centre Party chair, Kiviniemi, who passed a bear and elk-killing test last year, promptly invited Vladimir Putin to come to Finland on a bear shoot.

Comments on “Bear Shooting”

  1. Phil says:

    I discovered the other day that Albania is now a member of NATO – Enver Hoxha must be turning in his grave. On the other hand, non-membership isn’t unknown West of Finland – Sweden, Austria and Ireland are also holdouts.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement