« | Home | »


Tags: | |

Last summer, General Stanley McChrystal described US operations in Afghanistan as a ‘retail war’. Now, thanks to Michael Hastings’s notorious profile of the general in Rolling Stone, it’s clearer what McChrystal meant: the conflict isn’t only about winning over Afghans to the US cause, but also about selling a war that can’t be won to increasingly sceptical Americans.

The US commanders in Afghanistan know there can be no victory. Hastings quotes a colleague of McChrystal’s, Major-General Bill Mayville: ‘It’s not going to look like a win, smell like a win or taste like a win. This is going to end in an argument.’ Mayville, as Hastings explains, is one of McChrystal inner circle,

a handpicked collection of killers, spies, geniuses, patriots, political operators and outright maniacs. There’s a former head of British Special Forces, two Navy Seals, an Afghan Special Forces commando, a lawyer, two fighter pilots and at least two dozen combat veterans and counterinsurgency experts.

One of the lesser points to be drawn from Hastings’s piece is that the word ally is a term of derision for McChrystal’s team and refers to French and German troops, but not to British forces.

Hasting’s piece has become instantly famous for what McChrystal says about US civilian officials, such as Richard Holbrooke and Joe Biden, and McChrystal today goes to the White House to explain himself to Obama. Maybe he’ll be fired, maybe he won’t. Hastings implies, intriguingly, that if Obama does sack McChrystal, then the president will not just be getting rid of an outspoken and revered commander: Obama may risk bringing down the entire US strategy in Afghanistan that he agreed to last year. Whatever happens, today’s meeting at the White House may well be the beginning of Mayville’s ‘argument’.

When he was a cadet at West Point, McChrystal wrote a short story about an assassination attempt on an American president. Hastings writes:

As managing editor of The Pointer, the West Point literary magazine, McChrystal wrote seven short stories that eerily foreshadow many of the issues he would confront in his career. In one tale, a fictional officer complains about the difficulty of training foreign troops to fight; in another, a 19-year-old soldier kills a boy he mistakes for a terrorist. In ‘Brinkman’s Note’, a piece of suspense fiction, the unnamed narrator appears to be trying to stop a plot to assassinate the president. It turns out, however, that the narrator himself is the assassin, and he’s able to infiltrate the White House: ‘The president strode in smiling. From the right coat pocket of the raincoat I carried, I slowly drew forth my 32-caliber pistol. In Brinkman’s failure, I had succeeded.’

McChrystal presumably won’t be taking a 32-calibre pistol with him to the White House today. But if he is fired, his failure could be construed as a kind of limited personal success – to have extricated himself from the war in Afghanistan, even if the rest of the US army is still embroiled in it.

Comments on “Brinkmanship”

  1. Bad Bart says:

    This is great! McChrystal is finally in trouble for being reckless. Not because of his callous and wanton disregard for Iraqi and Afghani lives, which he obviously was willing to sacrifice for political expedience. Rather, the most horrible things he’s done are obviously his saying naughty (and in some ways quite astute) things about Obama, Biden and Holbrooke.

  2. Locus says:

    By sheer coincidence, a piece in today’s New York Times on how the ordinary decent soldiers on the ground have lost faith in McChrystal’s leadership, and never much liked him anyway. With the top brass insubordinate, it must be a relief for Washington that the NYT, at least, still knows how to take an order.

    “General Faces Unease Among His Own Troops, Too”

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement