« | Home | »

Israel’s New Humanitarianism

Tags: |

Last week, Israel permitted the transport of jam, halva and shaving razors into Gaza. Since September 2007, goods entering Gaza had been limited to a ‘humanitarian minimum’ of approximately 70 items of foodstuffs and medicines (4000 items were allowed in before the blockade). During a visit to Gaza in February 2009, John Kerry discovered that Israel had banned pasta but not rice, because the latter was considered a necessity while the former was a luxury.

After the flotilla fiasco and the widespread international condemnation that followed, it appears that Israel’s policy is changing and that Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is actually willing to broaden its definition of humanitarianism to include jam and halva. It is even possible that pasta will soon be allowed into Gaza. Browsing through a partial list of banned items, provided by the Israeli human rights group Gisha, one can only speculate which items will be the next to be allowed to enter Gaza with the adoption of Israel’s new humanitarianism.

Some of the things that can’t be imported to Gaza:

Comments on “Israel’s New Humanitarianism”

  1. Chris Larkin says:

    Interesting that ‘wood for construction’ and ‘fabric (for clothing)’ are considered luxury items. I’m fairly certain they would be more useful in keeping families from the elements than biscuits and jam. On second thoughts maybe i’m just buying the wrong digestives?

  2. semitone says:

    Chocolate? Those scoundrel Israelis are blockading chocolate? Even more dastardly than I thought.

    • Phil says:

      Actually it’s precisely because chocolate is a luxury that it’s so hard to identify a good reason for forcibly withholding it from the government and people of Gaza. I mean, it’s not weaponisable, as far as I’m aware.

    • pinhut says:

      You must have heard of the chocolate rockets, or chockets, that the Palestinians regularly launch into Israel, soiling numerous shirts and causing general consternation.

      However, Iran is currently providing ‘chocolate secrets’ to Hamas, who are now hellbent on the construction of a enormous Toblerone. While they insist this Toblerone is for peaceful purposes, the Israelis insist that ‘such a confection poses an existential threat to the state of Israel’. Rumours persist however, that Israel itself possesses an enormous undeclared store of hobnobs, that exist outside of all international legal frameworks and that may be used in a pre-emptive strike…

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Neil Kitson on Unwinnable War Two: There is no Chapter VII support for military action in Resolution 2249.
    • pinkycubin on Unwinnable War Two: Streetsj, It is obvious there is no clear 'solution'. That doesn't therefore mean that the use of ordnance dropped from height is part of the answ...
    • soadenubi on Being Lord Lugard: As a Nigerian normally resident in Lagos, I found the blog:Being Lord Lugard a most interesting read. This note is primarily a request that the Autho...
    • streetsj on Unwinnable War Two: Yes. So what's your solution? A negotiated settlement of peace for everyone. And who would disagree - but realistically what is the answer? One thing...
    • streetsj on What does Osborne want?: I have thought since 2010 that much of the most austere rhetoric has been directed at the financial markets. Meanwhile reality is very different as pu...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement