« | Home | »

Pride in Being Belgian

Tags: |

Last Monday, the Belgian prime minister handed in his resignation to King Albert II and another Belgian government fell. The cause: the withdrawal of a small Flemish party from the Christian Democrat Yves Leterme’s five-party coalition. New legislative elections have yet to be called but in the meantime Belgian politicians have managed to find something they can all agree on.

On Thursday, the lower house of parliament voted almost unanimously (136 deputies out of 138, with two abstentions) to ban the wearing of the full Islamic veil, or niqab, in public places. The legislation doesn’t anywhere actually mention the veil – merely forbidding ‘all clothing completely or mainly hiding the face’ – but no one has suggested that it’s aimed at motorcycle couriers or people whose idea of a good night out is a masked ball. The penalty will be a fine of 15 to 25 euros and/or up to a week in prison – opponents of the veil who describe it as a prison mobile seem to have no problem with putting women who wear one into actual prison if they have their best interests at heart.

Of Belgian’s 10.3 million citizens, 400,000 are Muslims. Let’s say that half of them (almost certainly an overestimate) are women. Of these, it’s possible that as few as 30 of them wear the full veil. And the Belgian police already have the power to stop and caution women with covered faces. In the last year and a half there have been 29 bookings in the whole of the central Brussels-Capital region, although it’s not clear if the warnings were issued to 29 separate women or one very persistent repeat offender.

But let us rejoice with the Liberal deputy Denis Ducarme in this rare moment of Belgian unity:

Our country’s image abroad is more and more incomprehensible, but, at least, in relation to the unanimity this vote in our parliament banning the burqa and niqab in our country will show, there is an element of pride in being Belgian.

Where Belgium leads, many hope, the rest of Europe will follow. Next up is France where, Le Figaro reported on Friday, a draft bill banning the full veil (sorry, ‘clothing intended to hide the face’) in public places will be presented to the council of ministers on 19 May. The fine proposed is a whopping 150 euros, with UMP deputies in favour of a 750-euro fine. Perhaps Belgian members of parliament, especially the Dutch speakers, will feel less pleased with themselves once they see an influx of cheapskate Francophone veiled burqa-wearers from next door.

Comments on “Pride in Being Belgian”

  1. PeterL says:

    Brilliant post. Appaently there is a derogation to the face-hiding law for Carnival-goers, although I’m not sure if this applies to niqab-wearing Carnival-goers. I fancy testing this next-year.

    Seriously though, did we need this further evidence that the Belgian political class should just pack up and go home? How long will it take these guys to abolish themselves? The comments of Mr. Ducarne are beyond parody…

  2. outofdate says:

    In the interest of whatchamacallit, we should also point out that in Saudi Arabia, etc. Some arguments luckily argue themselves while we nip out for a fag.

    • Thomas Jones says:

      I assume you’re not saying that because women are repressed in one way in Saudi Arabia it’s only fair to repress them in a different way in Belgium. But if you’re not saying that, what are you saying?

    • pinhut says:

      The necessary corollary in Saudi Arabia, or indeed any other Muslim country, would be to ban all people from not wearing a full veil.

      • outofdate says:

        There I’ve been struggling to think of a witty reply for half an hour or more, which obviously flies in the face of the point I was making in the first place, so [can we swear on this blog?] it: you win.

  3. Camus123 says:

    The Belgian government has no other problems? Several German Länder have banned teachers from wearing head scarves. A woman with Turkish origins has just been appointed minister in Lower Saxony – hailed as a breakthrough for the four million Muslims. And what did she say to a snide reporter? that crucifixes and head scarves ‘have no place in the class room’. This was smartly fielded by Minister President, who said that she had been misquoted. The German High Court has ruled that indeed crucifixes have no place in classrooms but that doesn’t seem to have been heard. Why headscarves are so subversive escapes me. I’m no friend of the Burkah so I hope that there is a Belgian feminist group that starts to talk to Muslims and even dons the odd head scarf. Echoes of ‘Snow’ by Orhan Pamuk?

  4. A.J.P. Crown says:

    I’m rather looking forward to donning a burkah when I go down the supermarket.

  5. astaire says:

    What does “Liberal” mean, if anything, to M. Ducarme?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement