« | Home | »

How to Break the System

Tags:

I never liked David Owen much – even by the standard of politicians, he always seemed to be a self-interested egomaniac – but his interview with David Hare in the Guardian today is interesting.

Owen’s most striking claim is this one:

I’m pleased that the great British public out there in their strange, almost instinctive way are groping towards a solution. They always do. The British electorate has got every election right in my lifetime, and I include the two in which I got kicked out.

Not sure I agree, but it’s an interesting way of putting it – and I suppose the last three elections at least can be said to have been got right, in that ‘we’ wanted the Tories out, then wanted Labour to have a big enough mandate to do the things it had promised to do the first time but hadn’t begun, then wanted them back in power because we couldn’t face the alternative but also wanted them to have had a nasty scare from the electorate and a reduced majority. What would getting the election right this time mean? I think the polls are starting to hint at an answer. Of the last 12 national opinion polls, four have shown the Lib Dems ahead, and one has been tied. Translated through the magic of our electoral system, that would leave the Lib Dems with the most votes and the fewest seats, Labour with the most seats and the fewest votes, and the Tories in the middle.

That result would break the electoral system. Nobody could defend an outcome with the top party coming bottom and vice versa. It would come close to breaking our unwritten constitution too. I’ve heard a theory that one reason there’s going to be a longer-than-usual 12-day gap between the election and the recall of Parliament is to avoid ‘embarrassing the Queen’. The fear is that Brenda herself might in some circumstances be seeming to choose the winner, when the electoral system had manifestly failed to do a fair job of it. Brenda could, of course, just invite Clegg and leave him to sort it out… yeah, right.

At least there’s a tentative glimpse of an optimistic scenario, in which the election result crashes the electoral system, and we get genuine structural reform as a result. Holding your breath for this outcome? Not advised.

Comments on “How to Break the System”

  1. pinhut says:

    “The British electorate has got every election right in my lifetime,”

    Owen plumps for the inherently sane qualities of the British electorate.

    It’s nothing more than flattery.

    Owen appears to have forgotten elections that were swayed by ridiculous PR stunts like The Falklands War and the first Gulf War, rather than by anything resembling reason on the part of the voters.

    In my lifetime, the only genuine good sense that was demonstrated by the British public, en masse, was the instinctive reaction to the Poll Tax.

  2. Camus123 says:

    “I’m pleased that the great British public out there in their strange, almost instinctive way are groping towards a solution. They always do.” The great British public will be pleased and humbled that you are pleased. What a pompous ass! Firstly, nothing strange about its certainly not an instinctive response – I agree with pinhut!

  3. pinhut says:

    “I agree with pinhut!”

    First time I have ever come across this phrase. Upon careful reflection, I like it!

  4. hexam says:

    David Owen’s most self-regarding remark is near the end: ‘I had power young. It’s healthy.’

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • pgillott on Wishful Thinking about Climate Change: Phrases like “monumental triumph” and (particularly) “renaissance for humankind” are overdoing it, but to suggest that there is no chance of ...
    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement