« | Home | »

Bonds, BNP, Bets

Tags: |

Just snippets today.

1. The bond market doesn’t care who wins, as long as somebody does. Nine out of ten funds questioned by the FT said that there was no difference between the Tories and Labour. But they don’t like the idea of a hung Parliament, because they think it’ll make it harder to tackle the deficit.

2. According to a report by the Institute for Public Policy Research, there is no correlation between levels of immigration and support for the BNP. Of the ten local authorities with the highest levels of BNP support, nine have levels of immigration lower than the national average. (The exception is Barking, which has the highest level of BNP support of anywhere in the UK, and where ethnic minorities have gone from being 5 per cent of the population to 35 per cent in a decade.)

3. Ladbrokes were offering 50-1 that one of the three party leaders will say the word Eyjafjallajökull in the second debate – but that was yesterday, and the odds have now tightened to 20-1. A lot of vulcanologist money must have poured in.

Comments on “Bonds, BNP, Bets”

  1. christianp says:

    Not just no correlation, negative correlation – areas with higher immigration have lower BNP support.

    I’m enough of a statistician to make that pedantic point, but not enough to say whether the authors of the report accounted for the fact that immigrants are very unlikely to support the BNP (and so bring down the numbers)

  2. SarahK says:

    Surely the correlation is curved. It rises with immigration, until immigrant population starts to dominate the voting population and supporting others?

    Is it possible to pull up odds for individual seats?

    Also, its pretty well known parly researchers and activists pump ££ into the betting markets to cause momentum and garner good press. Its their money to burn I suppose.

    • Thomas Jones says:

      No. There is no correlation. Or rather, as christianp says, negative correlation. If you read the IPPR paper, you’ll see that the graph isn’t a curve, it’s a straight line (and nowhere in Britain do immigrants come anywhere close to ‘dominating the voting population’). There is however a correlation between ‘socioeconomic and/or political exclusion’ and BNP support. Yet another reason why Labour should be ashamed of themselves.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • jayavarman on How to Rig an Election: Before US election day 2000, Jeb Bush's Florida government disenfranchised a large number of voters in primarily Democratic districts, though it still...
    • Harry Travis on How to Rig an Election: Mr. Newey's comment is exceptional, noting the non sequitur nature outrage by the US Establishment and especially the liberal US press. Trump, with hi...
    • ikp on Maddening, Fiendish, Formidable: To buy Nemo from the USA, email your order to the editor at ikp1000@cam.ac.uk. You can pay with PayPal.
    • thebears on How to Rig an Election: Can't comment on accuracy, but this certainly aspires to tell you how the Congressional races are looking: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/201...
    • Jeremy Bernstein on How to Rig an Election: As a physicist who has followed closely nuclear arms proliferation I have noted and commented on in print on Trump's willful ignorance of the subject...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement