« | Home | »

Bonds, BNP, Bets

Tags: |

Just snippets today.

1. The bond market doesn’t care who wins, as long as somebody does. Nine out of ten funds questioned by the FT said that there was no difference between the Tories and Labour. But they don’t like the idea of a hung Parliament, because they think it’ll make it harder to tackle the deficit.

2. According to a report by the Institute for Public Policy Research, there is no correlation between levels of immigration and support for the BNP. Of the ten local authorities with the highest levels of BNP support, nine have levels of immigration lower than the national average. (The exception is Barking, which has the highest level of BNP support of anywhere in the UK, and where ethnic minorities have gone from being 5 per cent of the population to 35 per cent in a decade.)

3. Ladbrokes were offering 50-1 that one of the three party leaders will say the word Eyjafjallajökull in the second debate – but that was yesterday, and the odds have now tightened to 20-1. A lot of vulcanologist money must have poured in.

Comments on “Bonds, BNP, Bets”

  1. christianp says:

    Not just no correlation, negative correlation – areas with higher immigration have lower BNP support.

    I’m enough of a statistician to make that pedantic point, but not enough to say whether the authors of the report accounted for the fact that immigrants are very unlikely to support the BNP (and so bring down the numbers)

  2. SarahK says:

    Surely the correlation is curved. It rises with immigration, until immigrant population starts to dominate the voting population and supporting others?

    Is it possible to pull up odds for individual seats?

    Also, its pretty well known parly researchers and activists pump ££ into the betting markets to cause momentum and garner good press. Its their money to burn I suppose.

    • Thomas Jones says:

      No. There is no correlation. Or rather, as christianp says, negative correlation. If you read the IPPR paper, you’ll see that the graph isn’t a curve, it’s a straight line (and nowhere in Britain do immigrants come anywhere close to ‘dominating the voting population’). There is however a correlation between ‘socioeconomic and/or political exclusion’ and BNP support. Yet another reason why Labour should be ashamed of themselves.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Michael Schuller on ‘Satoshi, Baby!’: I guess I can't really argue for or against the assertion that the bitcoin community as a whole is "resentful" over the idea of Wright claiming to be ...
    • Dean Alexander Coulter on Get in Formation: Thanks for the passionate conspectus of Lemonade. I was surprised to be so affected by Bey's album. I think it's a great work, visually, musically...
    • bluecat on A Whisper of a Beard: As always with Bosch, I find myself marvelling over mysterious details, usually in the distance - what is going on, on the right hand leaf of the trip...
    • editor@dailydetox.org on Investors v. States: Stunts such as TTIP never mention liberalizing the residence and employment rules so that people on either side could live and work wherever they choo...
    • streetsj on Investors v. States: Well, I guess they make out like bandits whatever. For a change I agree with some of what Glenn Newey says but it is also useful to read JonathanD...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement