« | Home | »

Light Speed

Tags: | |


Tomorrow at dusk, to mark the 1600th anniversary of the departure of the Romans from Britain, flaming torches will be lit every 250 metres along the length of Hadrian’s Wall, starting at the North Tyneside end, to create a ‘line of light from coast to coast’. It will take about an hour for the light to reach Carlisle, where it will be greeted with a variety of neopagan festivities:

Led by the stirring sounds of street band Tongues of Fire and impressive fiery engines (from Pandeamonium) and lit by thousands of flickering flames, a parade of costumed characters and musicians will follow the elusive and beautiful airborne Heliosphere through the streets.

It should all be very pretty, as long as it doesn’t rain.

You may be wondering, though, how the date of the end of the Roman occupation of Britain can appear to be known so precisely. It’s not as if there are any surviving fragments of any ancient Briton’s diary: ‘Saturday, 13 March 410. That’s the last of the buggers loaded onto their galleys and hightailing it for Gaul. And good riddance.’ Or indeed of any Roman’s: ‘As I was the last legionary to leave Britain the centurion asked me to turn the lights off. Very funny sir I said.’

The Romans are thought to have left by 410 because, according to the historian Zosimus, following Olympiodorus, the Emperor Honorius wrote to the Britons in that year telling them they’d have to fend for themselves; he needed all the troops he could muster to defend Rome from Alaric, who sacked the city anyway.

As for why the wall’s being lit up tomorrow, rather than on any other day of the year: to coincide with a conference at the British Museum this weekend, called ‘Debating the End’. As so often, the answer to the question ‘how do we know?’ turns out to be ‘we don’t.’

Comments on “Light Speed”

  1. Camus123 says:

    Can anybody tell me why this is being celebrated? Who’s paying for it?

    • Thomas Jones says:

      Among the funders is the Northern Rock Foundation.

      The Foundation was established when Northern Rock de-mutualised in 1997. Up to December 2007 Northern Rock donated 5% of its annual pre-tax profits to the Foundation, and has subsequently made an annual donation of £15 million.

      So I suppose the government’s paying, indirectly, for some of it.

  2. jsager says:

    Now that is one heck of a birthday bash. Of course it’s nice to know that someone is still leaving the lights on for the departed Romans, since the withdraw was only meant to be temporary to deal with the bothersome Vandals who had no respect for culture – drawing mustaches and pirate patches all over nice Roman busts. Not the type of people you bring out the nice china for.

  3. Martin says:

    It’s not the only anniversary to have a date arbitrarily assigned to it. After all, one of the biggest of them all, Christmas, bears no relation to the date of Christ’s birth, but is just tacked onto the date of a Roman celebration – Saturnalia. Plenty more examples, I’m sure.

  4. Thomas Jones says:

    Good point. There’s also Shakespeare’s birthday, which just so happens to fall conveniently on St George’s Day.

  5. gemma.laming says:

    Come on, cheer up you unhappy Brits! I think it was a great idea, and a wonderful thing to do just before the spring equinox.

    I think it should become a yearly celebration!!

    As ever, it is not just the doing of something like this, it is to think of it in the first place.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement