« | Home | »

Needs No Thanks

Tags: |

A selection of recent book dedications, the last two from the same novel: a prize for guessing who it’s by.

‘I’d like to thank my girlfriend… who travelled with me while I did the field work, and read through the whole manuscript at stages. Admittedly she was paid handsomely in fine Italian wine.’

‘In Memoriam Matris’

‘To Barack and Michelle Obama, and the future of American art’

‘To complainers everywhere’

‘to mine enemies, without whom none of this would have been possible’

‘Animals possess a purity that exceeds even that of children and they have much to teach us, if only we will cease our arrogance and listen. I am grateful to my late dogs, Nicky, Wendy and Tiger, and my late cats, Percy, Emily, Toby, Big Syd and Homer Wells Lamb.’

‘I would like to dedicate this book to the word “humility”.’

‘I would also like to give my thanks to Jane Austen. Childless, like so many of the great feminists, she is nonetheless the mother, I believe, of “the line of sanity” that so characterises the English novel.’

‘Shakespeare, defying all rules and properties as usual, needs no thanks from this writer.’

Comments on “Needs No Thanks”

  1. Niall Anderson says:

    I’m guessing they’re from the The Pregnant Widow.

  2. I’m guessing item 6 is from JM Coetzee. Or not.

  3. jcclakeru says:

    I think the line of sanity has been crossed.

  4. Niall Anderson says:

    Do I win a prize, then? Or is the LRB just adumbrating the prize-giving impulse, rather than advocating it?

  5. Niall Anderson had correctly identified Martin Amis’s new novel, winning a voucher to the LRB bookshop.

  6. Niall Anderson says:

    I’d just like to give thanks to Philip Roth. Childless, like most of the great misogynists, he is nonetheless the father, I believe, of “the archetypal ballbreaker” that so often populates the modern American novel by men of a certain age.

  7. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Who wrote the “fine Italian wine” and “Animals possess a purity” ones?

  8. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Does anyone besides me read old posts?

  9. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Oh, come on Deborah Friedell, put me out of my misery. I know you’re in there somewhere.

  10. I’m sorry to tell you that we’ve decided not to shame these writers by name (either that or I no longer remember).

  11. A.J.P. Crown says:

    And googling the phrase only brings me back here. Actually, I quite like the animal one; I see nothing shameful in dedicating one’s books to a dog. You really should be encouraging that kind of thing.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Neil Kitson on Unwinnable War Two: There is no Chapter VII support for military action in Resolution 2249.
    • pinkycubin on Unwinnable War Two: Streetsj, It is obvious there is no clear 'solution'. That doesn't therefore mean that the use of ordnance dropped from height is part of the answ...
    • soadenubi on Being Lord Lugard: As a Nigerian normally resident in Lagos, I found the blog:Being Lord Lugard a most interesting read. This note is primarily a request that the Autho...
    • streetsj on Unwinnable War Two: Yes. So what's your solution? A negotiated settlement of peace for everyone. And who would disagree - but realistically what is the answer? One thing...
    • streetsj on What does Osborne want?: I have thought since 2010 that much of the most austere rhetoric has been directed at the financial markets. Meanwhile reality is very different as pu...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement