« | Home | »

Going Dutch

Tags: |

I was just watching a news item on Sky. It was a programme about TNT, the Dutch national mail company that has recently been ‘liberalised’. This is the company that earlier in the year Peter Mandelson suggested as a possible buyer for the Royal Mail.

Postmen over there are losing their jobs. Fixed contracts are being replaced by ‘flexible’ contracts, full-time postmen by ‘freelance’ postmen. People who have been doing the same round for 31 years are being got rid of and made to reapply for their jobs, but on a freelance basis.

The Dutch minister responsible for the change was being interviewed. ‘As consumers,’ he said, ‘and especially from business to consumer, there is more flexibility. Competition has made mail companies modernise, and that’s where consumers profit from.’

You have to pay attention to the words here.

Liberalised: That means open to competition, regardless of the quality of service. Cleaning services in hospitals were ‘liberalised’ and that gave us MRSA. Catering facilities in schools were ‘liberalised’ and that gave us turkey twizzler dinners. Rail maintenance and engineering got ‘liberalised’ and that gave us the Paddington rail crash.

Flexible: Flexible always means more work for the same pay; or in the case of TNT, more work for less pay.

Freelance postmen: Is this like being a freelance writer? Can I pick up the post any time I choose? Can I only post those letters I’m interested in? Of course not. What it actually means is ‘casual’, meaning you have no fixed contract, and anyone who’s willing to work for less can undercut you at any point.

But it was the Dutch minister’s words that were the most interesting. He used the word ‘consumer’ three times, but he did a clever thing. He shifted the meaning of the word from the beginning of the interview to the end. At the opening of his statement he meant it in the generalised sense, meaning everyone, you and me. Then he added that word business – ‘from business to consumer’ – and by the third use of the word it is clear that he is referring to something else entirely: to business consumers. Corporate consumers. Consumers who will make profits.

So now you know who is driving these changes to our mail service. It isn’t being done for the benefit of the ordinary customer, but by the corporations for profit.

Comments on “Going Dutch”

  1. Mainwaring says:

    The Banks were ‘liberalised’ and look what happened. Ordinary working people will be paying the price for generations to come.

    Don’t forget too that it was Gordon Brown wot done it. He liberalised the banks after his first idea to build a Super Casino in every town and village in the land as a way of paying for New Labour’s warmongering profligacy hit the buffers.

    That mad idea was rightly kyboshed by the common sense British Public. So Gordon and his underworld Pal Fred The Shred went and turned every bank in the high street into a Casino. The only difference being they got to gamble with your money and they got to keep the winnings. Poor Joe Public was not to share in the winnings when times were good just to eat the losses when it all went wrong. That was the plan and it worked. Now they are all off to sunnier tax free climes with their bags of swag.

    The sooner Labour goes back to its roots, remembers the workers and puts Gordon, Tony, Mandy, and all their Lord Snooty Banker pals into labour camps the better. Yeah and shove that croquet playing traitor to the working classes Two Jags in with them. That’ll make a quartet. Then they could sing as they sew mail bags. To the tune of The Red Flag:- “The working class can kiss my arse, I’ve got the foreman’s job at last.”

    But what are we to do? Who to vote for? The Con Labour Party, the Con Tory Party or the Con Liberals – with ‘Con’ meaning Conmen, not Conservative. They all want to sell Britain down the river.

  2. the abbot postie says:

    Hi Roy,
    As you know, next year we are expecting the a lot of new technology to be installed, also including the new “walk sequencing machines”, allegedly meaning our prep will be greatly reduced. Well i will be interested to see how successfully that works, as at the moment our automation means that i regularly receive coded mail for chingford in my boxes-i work in an office in south west england!
    A colleague in a mail centre in this county told me that the staff there were offered “buy down” hours, from full time to part time, say a new contract of 20 hours a week.
    Unfortunately when the staff scrutinised the new contract they saw that it was valid for one year and had to be renewed after that.Not surprisingly, to date, no one has taken up the offer and management have had to go back to the drawing board!

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement