« | Home | »

On the Picket Line

Tags: |

I’ve just got back from the picket line. There were ten of us at the gate while about the same number had crossed the picket line and gone into work.

That was a bit sad. Some of them weren’t members of the union, so had no choice. Mind you, they had the choice whether to join the union or not, and would take the benefits if we won the dispute. One or two of the younger members were still on their trial contract, so were worried in case it wasn’t renewed. I have a lot of sympathy for them. But the sad thing was seeing union members go in. One of them was overheard to say that he used the union when he needed it, but otherwise he wasn’t interested. I don’t think I can ever respect the man again.

On the other hand, we had a spy on the inside who was popping out every so often bringing us regular updates about what was going on. Apparently they’d opened up the vending machine and were getting free teas and coffees.

At a certain point one of the vans went screeching out. And then, about ten minutes later, it came speeding back in again. It was driven by one of the managers who used to be a postie. You could see from the look on her face that she’d rather be outside with us.

Word came out that the van wasn’t on Royal Mail business at all. It had gone to fetch bacon and sausage baguettes. They were getting bacon and sausage baguettes in there! That made me laugh. I’ve heard of selling your birthright for a mess of pottage, but for a bacon baguette and a lousy cup of coffee?

We had to make do with some home-made cake brought to us by the local branch of the SWP.

Later the press turned up and took photos of us lined up in front of the Royal Mail logo.

The manager came out. ‘Do you have permission to take pictures of Royal Mail property?’ he asked.

The photographer gave him the once over. ‘I don’t need permission,’ she said, and walked off.

I’m looking forward to seeing myself in the paper next week.

Comments on “On the Picket Line”

  1. Phil says:

    They were getting bacon and sausage baguettes in there!

    You never know, it could backfire on them.

    A friend of a friend dated his political education to the day when, young and naive and generally bolshie, he refused to be told to go out on strike and crossed a picket line to get in to work. At 11.00 the management sent round cream cakes for everyone who had come in.

    He never crossed a picket line again.

  2. Roy Mayall says:

    I dunno Phil, maybe bacon baguettes are more of a temptation than cream cakes?

  3. Phil says:

    Er… I think it was the feeling of having been bought he objected to, not the cream cakes as such.

  4. Phil says:

    I thought you might. Never mind.

  5. clashcityrocker says:

    You do not have to be in the union to take part in strike action.Non unionised strikers are protected by law just as unionised strikers are.

  6. Roy Mayall says:

    Will tell people about this clashcityrocker, but you know how it is: there’s a lot of bullying, and those who are not in the union aren’t in the union for a reason. One of my mates, who had left the union rejoined when he knew the strike was coming because he couldn’t stand being left out. The others never joined in the first place.

  7. siroisan says:

    Should people on pickets lines be there in part because they do not like what they term managerial bullying, they should be clear that they themselves are bullies by trying to intimidate people into not going to work.

  8. Norrie says:

    Didn’t sound much like there was a lot of bullying going on Roy’s picketline. Have you ever actually been on strike? Because I can assure you having had the experience once in my life that the pressure from management is a great deal more unpleasant than any pressure generated by strikers standing in the cold at a gate and as far as I know no union member has ever been able to call out the police to break a negotiation deadlock with management.

  9. Roy Mayall says:

    There’s no bullying on a picket line. You cannot stop people going into work. At the worst there’s a bit of banter, that’s all.

  10. the abbot postie says:

    Thank you for articulating, so accurately, the life of a postie, you should be proud of yourself for what you’ve done for so many of us old hands.
    I have a little story about one of my colleagues, a part time-32 hour delivery contract-which is combined with her afternoon job of hairdresser.
    I have always got on well with this lady, 2 years ago she was dismissed on the attendance procedure, but thanks to our excellent union rep was reinstated.
    You can imagine my severe disappointment to hear recently that she had worked during the strike,having gone into an office in a nearby village.
    Whatever her financial state, had the union not managed to have got her reinstated she would have lost 3 years postie salary, significantly more than the loss of a few days being out on strike.
    I just find it really sad that people like this are prepared to use the union but rely on us to fight for the rights and benefits they enjoy.
    Am i wrong in feeling betrayed?

  11. Roy Mayall says:

    No you’re not wrong A.P. It’s so sad that people don’t understand how important it is to have a union. Things are pretty shitty in the Royal Mail at the moment: imagine how much worse it would be without even the minimal protection our union provides.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement