« | Home | »

Restoring Democracy

Tags: |

Last week, Sondhi Limthongkul became leader of Thailand’s New Politics Party. Sondhi, a former media mogul, is one of the men behind the ongoing demonstrations that precipitated the military coup overthrowing Thaksin Shinawatra in 2006, and which since then have given the military and the judiciary a pretext to bar Thaksin’s proxies from holding office.

Thaksin was elected prime minister in 2001 on the strength of his support among the rural poor. Though clearly corrupt, ruthless towards his opponents and uncaring about the rule of law, he also slashed the bureaucracy, scaled back the military and directed massive state spending to the poor. In 2006, the old oligarchy fought back. Thaksin’s supporters have since taken to the streets themselves in an attempt to bring down the current government, which is led by technocrats aligned with the old elite.

The creation of the New Politics Party is a sign that members of the elite who were once happy to pull the strings from behind the scenes are now intending to engage in politics more directly. But despite some Thais’ hopes, the development of new parties like Sondhi’s is hardly promising for democracy. One of Sondhi’s demands during the street protests was that a number of elected MPs should be replaced by appointed members, because the rural poor weren’t smart enough to choose their own representatives.

Members of the new party I’ve spoken with have suggested that, if another leader like Thaksin were to win the general election that’s due before 2011, they would again encourage the military to step in and ‘restore democracy’. For a clue to what democracy might mean in this context, look no further than the party’s internal politics: Sondhi was essentially made leader by acclamation, with the other contenders withdrawing before the vote.

Comments on “Restoring Democracy”

  1. Mark C says:

    Thaksin being “uncaring about the rule of law” seems a bit of a euphemism for the anti-drug crackdown his governemnt ordered, in which it is beleived that over 2,000 people were subject to extrajudicial murder.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement