« | Home | »

I won!

Tags: | |

Auctions are often plagued by something called the winner’s curse. The person who ‘wins’ the painting or Floridian land parcel usually pays too much for it. Unless the winner knows something that the other bidders don’t, he’s probably overvalued the object: otherwise, why wouldn’t someone else in the room be willing to pay as much?

But the online charity auctions run by raffle.it are in a format I hadn’t encountered before – they seemed, possibly, curse free. Each of their auctions is like a regular raffle, except you get to choose your own number (only positive integers are allowed). The winner is whoever has the lowest unique number: if Anne has 2, Betty has 3, Cindy has 2 and Diana has 7, then Betty wins. Once you’ve chosen your number, you’re told whether or not someone else has already gone for it. If someone else picks your number before the raffle ends, you’re alerted by email. Either way, you have the chance to bid again.

The raffle that I played was in aid of a charity called Mothers4Children, run by the supermodels Lisa B. and Yasmin Le Bon, and most of the prizes were things like cashmere sweater sets for infants, spa days, pushchairs more complicated than cars. For most of the raffles, tickets cost £1 each.

For a substantial Selfridges gift certificate, I later found out, bids had been all over the place: fifteen people went for 1, nine said 2, ten plumped for 3; the most popular number was 7, with sixteen people convinced it was lucky; there were a few high numbers, like 399 or 432. Several people bought multiple tickets, but no one else went at it systematically. I started at 1 (not unique), then 2 (not unique), all the way up to 53, which was unique, and there I stopped. Several of my guesses were defensive: only one other person had picked 38, for example, and if I hadn’t also bid that number, she’d have won. For the Montblanc pen, bidders guessed as high as 57: I won it at 8. A spa day at Harvey Nichols: 14. The cashmere sweaters (I thought of someone who wouldn’t mind the dry-cleaning bills): 2.

What might have constituted a winner’s curse? If there had been someone else as convinced as I was that she knew the secret. For the Selfridges prize, if someone else had guessed 53, I would have kept going – where would I have stopped? What if there were more than two of us – ten of us, a hundred of us – playing the same raffle? For a £2000 gift certificate, would I have stopped at 2000 numbers? Or would I have kept playing, trying to minimise my losses, telling myself that at least the money was going to something that might pass for a good cause?

Comments on “I won!”

  1. Patrick Xavier says:

    How is that a curse free auction? You bid £53 for 1-53, which happened also to be your win price. But you could, as you noted, also have paid £53, for 1-53, to have won at 38. Or you could have paid £100 for 1-100, to win at 53 (or 38). It’s not even a curse free raffle, in which you might pay £1 for 53, because then 38 would have won it.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement