<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgenbesserisms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2009/09/22/holt1789/morgenbesserisms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2009/09/22/holt1789/morgenbesserisms/</link>
	<description>The Blog of the London Review of Books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2009/09/22/holt1789/morgenbesserisms/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=1607#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Nice post! Really very informative. Thanks for sharing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post! Really very informative. Thanks for sharing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: requiemapache</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2009/09/22/holt1789/morgenbesserisms/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>requiemapache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=1607#comment-193</guid>
		<description>The double affirmative is hilarious and reminded me of a joke Jerry Fodor told at the end of Michael Frayn review:

&quot;I will tell you a philosophical joke. Once upon a time, a visiting scholar presented a lecture on the topic: ‘How many philosophical positions are there in principle?’ ‘In principle,’ he began, ‘there are exactly 12 philosophical positions.’ A voice called from the audience: ‘Thirteen.’ ‘There are,’ the lecturer repeated, ‘exactly 12 possible philosophical positions; not one less and not one more.’ ‘Thirteen,’ the voice from the audience called again. ‘Very well, then,’ said the lecturer, now perceptibly irked, ‘I shall proceed to enumerate the 12 possible philosophical positions. The first is sometimes called “naive realism”. It is the view according to which things are, by and large, very much the way that they seem to be.’ ‘Oh,’ said the voice from the audience. ‘Fourteen!’&quot;

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n18/fodo01_.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The double affirmative is hilarious and reminded me of a joke Jerry Fodor told at the end of Michael Frayn review:</p>
<p>&#8220;I will tell you a philosophical joke. Once upon a time, a visiting scholar presented a lecture on the topic: ‘How many philosophical positions are there in principle?’ ‘In principle,’ he began, ‘there are exactly 12 philosophical positions.’ A voice called from the audience: ‘Thirteen.’ ‘There are,’ the lecturer repeated, ‘exactly 12 possible philosophical positions; not one less and not one more.’ ‘Thirteen,’ the voice from the audience called again. ‘Very well, then,’ said the lecturer, now perceptibly irked, ‘I shall proceed to enumerate the 12 possible philosophical positions. The first is sometimes called “naive realism”. It is the view according to which things are, by and large, very much the way that they seem to be.’ ‘Oh,’ said the voice from the audience. ‘Fourteen!’&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n18/fodo01_.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n18/fodo01_.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Holt</title>
		<link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2009/09/22/holt1789/morgenbesserisms/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/?p=1607#comment-188</guid>
		<description>After writing this post yesterday, I went out to get lunch. And who should be at the bread counter of the deli but William James Earle himself! I hadn&#039;t seen him since Sidney Morgenbesser&#039;s memorial service five years ago.
Coincidence? Synchronicity? Backwards causation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After writing this post yesterday, I went out to get lunch. And who should be at the bread counter of the deli but William James Earle himself! I hadn&#8217;t seen him since Sidney Morgenbesser&#8217;s memorial service five years ago.<br />
Coincidence? Synchronicity? Backwards causation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/13 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.lrb.co.uk @ 2012-02-11 07:17:35 -->
