« | Home | »

How many troops?

Tags: | |

In 1880, David Barbour, a member of the Indian Civil Service, published a pamphlet called Our Afghan Policy and the Occupation of Candahar. Barbour argued that the British war in Afghanistan was both morally unjustifiable and politically inexpedient.

One of his more striking assessments was that ‘the thorough occupation of Afghanistan, including the Provinces of Cabul, Candahar, Herat, and Afghan Turkestan by troops who could under all circumstances be depended on, would require the services of 60,000 English troops’.

At the end of July this year there were approximately 64,500 Nato troops in Afghanistan. Yet the thorough occupation of the country – let alone its transformation into a stable democracy –  seems as remote as ever.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • suetonius on We Need to Talk about Donald: Does Prof. Turkle really think there was civility in the US in the past? In politics? In private? Neither, I think. Plenty of racism, sexism, the ...
    • Graucho on Gaitskell and Europe: This was something I picked up in a TV program about Brexit, but I can't find a web reference either. The thing is that Heath's terms were then renego...
    • Stu Bry on We Need to Talk about Donald: The Trump candidacy has meant that politics need not be discussed the election campaign. The establishment candidate has a free ride to the Whitehouse...
    • Joshua K on We Need to Talk about Donald: Given Trump's not going to be president, I'd say we need to talk about Hillary. The revelation of her two-faced private agenda has been completely bur...
    • streetsj on The Horrors of Heathrow: I remember reading the Gilmour piece when it came out. There seem to have been so many opportunities in the past 70 years to resite London's main airp...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement