« | Home | »

Biggest Loser, Bikini, Bingo

Tags: | | | |

Microsoft says that its brand-new search engine, Bing, delivers results that are just as good as those of its competitors. But Bing is no mere imitator, slavishly copying those that have gone before. Just compare a search for ‘Bing market share’ on Bing with the same search as performed by what Microsoft coyly calls the ‘market leader’. Despite the undoubtedly unprejudiced algorithmic approach of both technologies, the results look very different.

The headlines according to Bing: ‘Microsoft gets search market share boost with Bing’; ‘Bing overtakes Yahoo!’ Don’t be so sure, says Google: ‘Bing market share: it’s just too early to tell’; ‘Bing’s market share ripple’. Perhaps we could put the anomaly down to a difference of ethos. Microsoft: upbeat, optimistic, cute. Google: sceptical, questioning, severe. Of course, scepticism can easily shade into sarcasm, which may explain Google’s suggestion when you search for ‘Bing’ itself:

bingo

In fact, you might not even get as far as clicking the search button. These days, further suggestions appear as you type. As soon as you’ve entered the letters ‘b’ and ‘i’, Google suggests all sorts of alternatives:

google-bi

Microsoft has included the same feature. This is a mistake:

bing-bi

Various commentators have agreed with Microsoft that Bing’s search results are practically indistinguishable from Google’s. I suspect this may be because they’ve been experimenting with the easy stuff, like their own names. With most real-life queries, the difficulty is knowing what’s actually being searched for. Google has a presumably insurmountable advantage in this game, having been at it for ten years. Every time you search on Google you feed it more data. If you don’t find what you’re looking for first time round – if, say, you don’t click on any of the results and reformulate your query – the megabrain has learned something new about what you were looking for in the first place. It’s quite scary. If you can’t tell the difference between Microsoft’s David and Google’s Goliath, try searching for someone else‘s name for a change.

Microsoft should be cheering about one thing at least. Despite a long battle, Google Inc has failed to keep the verb ‘to google’ out of the dictionary, a development that puts its trademark at risk. Microsoft has been cleverer. I ‘binged’ it? I ‘bang’ it? It was ‘bung’? It’s not going to stick. Clever, but in a way a shame. Since Microsoft has been known to pay people for searching with them, ‘bung’ wouldn’t be inappropriate.

Comments on “Biggest Loser, Bikini, Bingo”

  1. Phil says:

    On this story above all, I’m sorry to read that “pinging is currently not allowed”. (Incidentally, “I pinged it” works perfectly well.)

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement