« | Home | »


Tags: | | | | |

There has, I hear, been much whispering in dark corners at the Palace of Westminster in recent days. But if the papers are to be believed, the darkest of dark whisperings have been taking place on the internet, in the form of the super-secret ‘Hotmail conspiracy’ to oust Gordon Brown. To recap: on Wednesday night, a few hours before polling opened for the European and local elections, the Guardian exclusively revealed that a group of parliamentary plotters had set up an anonymous webmail address, signonnow@hotmail.co.uk, in order to gather virtual signatories to a virtual letter calling for the PM to resign. The Times published a photograph of a convincingly rumpled print-out of the would-be letter, and Sky News released the wording in full. This was clearly a very secret secret.

There was some disagreement about the mechanics of the plot, but it was said that the ringleaders – all seven of them, or eight; all leftish ‘usual suspects’, or all right-wing ‘Blearistas’ – had promised anonymity to Labour MPs who emailed in the secret passphrase (that’s ‘I agree’). Only when 50 signatures had been collected would the names be revealed. It was also said that 60 MPs were prepared to sign the letter, which wasn’t quite the 70 needed to instigate a leadership election under Labour Party rules, but it sounded impressive nevertheless. It also sounded rather like a figure plucked from the ether, since some plausible potential plotters said they’d never got the email. Others said they’d got one from alistairdarling@gmail.com, a nice piece of disguise.

Those with some experience of palace coups have pointed out a problem with the Hotmail scheme. Any really good plotter knows that to use your work email address to conduct secret business is a definite no-no. You need a proper alias, like i_want_to_be_pm@yahoo.co.uk or therealdavidmiliband@hushmail.com. Of course, this leads to potential difficulties: can the ringleaders be absolutely certain that if someone calling themselves ‘John Reid’ signs up to signonnow@hotmail.co.uk they are the actual Right Honourable Member for Airdrie and Shotts? When the location of the virtual dead letter box was disclosed to every newspaper reader in the country – and whose fault was that? – the possibility for confusion was multiplied: could it be that there are angry people out there with views of their own? The corresponding difficulty, potentially rebellious MPs suddenly realised, was that there was no way of knowing whether signonnow@hotmail.co.uk wasn’t an elaborate cover set up by the whips’ office to entrap would-be plotters. There was panic on the already jittery backbenches. This was now a regular hall of mirrors; either that, or just another day in the dying of New Labour.

I’m embarrassed to say I have a nerdier difficulty with the Hotmail conspiracy. It’s no longer a breeze to set up an email address at hotmail.co.uk. I think of myself as internet-savvy, as most MPs like to say they are not, and the only way I could find of getting one – rather than being redirected to the jazzily rebranded live.com or the coolly international hotmail.com – was by playing around in a search engine with quote marks and select phrases to find the page I already knew I was looking for. Here’s a new cause for concern: what if the signonnow email address isn’t a plotters’ gambit after all, but an outdated publicity effort set up under Blair for Jobcentre Plus? Where would writing to them get you?

Another theory going the rounds is that all the talk about signonnow is just a diversionary tactic: surely this open secret is a double blind, meant to hide the real means to register revolt; somewhere there’s another email address to which genuine rebels can apply. If that’s your worry, I can exclusively guarantee that if you email buggeroffgordon@hotmail.co.uk, right now, your complaint will be noted in the proper way.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Neil Kitson on Unwinnable War Two: There is no Chapter VII support for military action in Resolution 2249.
    • pinkycubin on Unwinnable War Two: Streetsj, It is obvious there is no clear 'solution'. That doesn't therefore mean that the use of ordnance dropped from height is part of the answ...
    • soadenubi on Being Lord Lugard: As a Nigerian normally resident in Lagos, I found the blog:Being Lord Lugard a most interesting read. This note is primarily a request that the Autho...
    • streetsj on Unwinnable War Two: Yes. So what's your solution? A negotiated settlement of peace for everyone. And who would disagree - but realistically what is the answer? One thing...
    • streetsj on What does Osborne want?: I have thought since 2010 that much of the most austere rhetoric has been directed at the financial markets. Meanwhile reality is very different as pu...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement