« | Home | »

Short Termism

Tags: | | | | | |

Short-term profiteering is one explanation for the banking crisis. Who was among those who warned of the dangers of short-term economic and financial thinking? Gordon Brown, who has begun to resemble Richard Nixon in the way he is clinging to power because that’s all there is left to cling to.

Twenty years ago, in two pieces he wrote for the LRB, Brown attacked Thatcher for promoting short-term gain at the expense of long-term investment and research. In fact, Brown equated the entire Thatcher project with short-term thinking, blind as he also believed it was to long-term growth. ‘Despite its unquestionably open economy,’ he wrote in 1990, ‘Britain has nothing like the number of top-class industries that Germany or Japan enjoys. Our industries are widely spread but lack depth. We are weaker in machinery industries than Italy or Switzerland. Our infrastructures, once the envy of the world, are now a major hindrance.’

‘Thatcherism has been immensely destructive,’ Brown wrote a year earlier. ‘Her market-obsessed solutions have made our problems worse.’ In 1990, Brown didn’t seem to believe that the legacy of Thatcher would be long-lasting, or that her policies couldn’t be reversed: he seemed to think that Thatcherism would vanish just as soon as the Labour party was elected. ‘When Thatcherism becomes a “wasm”,’ Brown wrote in 1989, ‘everyone will wonder what all the fuss was about.’ Which makes it all the stranger that Brown himself – first as chancellor, then as prime minister, in what looks set to be a very short term indeed – was so content to continue the Thatcherite project.

And where has Tony Blair been when Brown has most needed him? Absent. In January, he was in Washington to receive the Medal of Freedom conferred on him by George Bush. He then led a prayer breakfast at the Obama White House, where he talked of God’s love 31 times and, more important, drew Obama’s praise. He’s been in the Middle East, testified before Congress, taught at Yale and presided over the Tony Blair Faith Foundation. God’s love is one thing; Blair’s love apparently another. Not that this is so surprising: the downfall of Brown suits Blair all too well. It will be Brown, not Blair, who will be remembered for bringing New Labour to its end.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Neil Kitson on Unwinnable War Two: There is no Chapter VII support for military action in Resolution 2249.
    • pinkycubin on Unwinnable War Two: Streetsj, It is obvious there is no clear 'solution'. That doesn't therefore mean that the use of ordnance dropped from height is part of the answ...
    • soadenubi on Being Lord Lugard: As a Nigerian normally resident in Lagos, I found the blog:Being Lord Lugard a most interesting read. This note is primarily a request that the Autho...
    • streetsj on Unwinnable War Two: Yes. So what's your solution? A negotiated settlement of peace for everyone. And who would disagree - but realistically what is the answer? One thing...
    • streetsj on What does Osborne want?: I have thought since 2010 that much of the most austere rhetoric has been directed at the financial markets. Meanwhile reality is very different as pu...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement